Peak profile fitting in X-ray Crystallography, why Voigt?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the peak profile fitting in X-ray crystallography, specifically the use of the Voigt function, which combines Gaussian and Lorentzian profiles. Participants explore the physical reasons behind the Gaussian and Lorentzian components and inquire about the skewness of the peaks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that Gaussian lineshapes arise from inhomogeneous broadening mechanisms, such as Doppler effects and local strain.
  • Others argue that Lorentzian lineshapes are attributed to homogeneous broadening mechanisms, including collisions and pressure broadening.
  • A later reply questions the existence of an explanation for the skewness of the peaks, indicating uncertainty on this aspect.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views regarding the physical origins of the Gaussian and Lorentzian components, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the skewness of the peaks.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of detailed exploration into the specific mechanisms causing skewness and the dependence on definitions of broadening types.

C_Pu
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,I've been doing a lab cycle on X-ray crystallography. We are using Cu X-ray source on chloride salt crystals. It seems that the Bragg peak profile are commonly acknowledged to be a Voigt function, which is a convolution of Gaussian and Lorentzian. I am wondering what's the physical reason for this. What causes the Gaussian spread and what leads to the Lorentzian component?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
C_Pu said:
Hi,I've been doing a lab cycle on X-ray crystallography. We are using Cu X-ray source on chloride salt crystals. It seems that the Bragg peak profile are commonly acknowledged to be a Voigt function, which is a convolution of Gaussian and Lorentzian. I am wondering what's the physical reason for this. What causes the Gaussian spread and what leads to the Lorentzian component?

Gaussian lineshapes are due to inhomogeneous broadening mechanisms (Doppler, local strain, etc), while Lorentzian are due to homogeneous broadening mechanisms (collisions, pressure broadening etc).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: C_Pu
Andy Resnick said:
Gassian lineshapes are due to inhomogeneous broadening mechanisms (Doppler, local strain, etc), while Lorentzian are due to homogeneous broadening mechanisms (collisions, pressure broadening etc).
And is there an explanation for skewness of the peaks?
 
C_Pu said:
And is there an explanation for skewness of the peaks?

No clue. Don't know of one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K