Peak wavelength and Spectral Bandwidth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the peak wavelength and spectral bandwidth of GaAs and silicon LEDs at liquid nitrogen and room temperatures. The peak wavelengths calculated are approximately 0.867 μm for GaAs and 1.088 μm for silicon, with spectral bandwidths derived from temperature-dependent equations. Participants express uncertainty regarding the definition of "better emitter," with suggestions that it relates to brightness or total energy emitted. Clarifications are sought on the meanings of peak wavelength and spectral bandwidth, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of these parameters in the context of LEDs. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of defining key terms to assess the performance of different LED materials.
says
Messages
585
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


Calculate the expected peak wavelength and spectral bandwidth (in units of wavelength) of the
emission for both a GaAs and silicon LED at liquid nitrogen temperature (77 K) and room temperature (300 K). Which of these cases would you expect to result in the best emitter and why?

Homework Equations


λg = hc/Eg
λg: maximum wavelength
λg [μm] = 1.24/Eg

Spectral bandwidth = (1.8kbT) / ħ

The Attempt at a Solution


λg: band gap represents minimum energy, or maximum wavelength for which an electron-hole pair can be excited

GaAs Eg: 1.43 eV
Si Eg: 1.14 eV

λg [μm] = 1.24/1.43 = 0.867 μm (maximum wavelength for GaAs)

λg [μm] = 1.24/1.14 = 1.088 μm (maximum wavelength for Si)

---

Spectral bandwidth = (1.8kb*300k) / ħ = 3.928*1013Hz
Expressing this in units of wavelength, I've used the relation between frequency and wavelength:

λ=c/f = c / 3.928*1013Hz
=7.6*10-6m

Spectral bandwidth = (1.8kb*77k) / ħ = 1.008*1013Hz = 2.9*10-5m/s
Expressing this in units of wavelength, I've used the relation between frequency and wavelength:

λ=c/f = c / 1.008*1013Hz
= 2.9*10-5m

So I think I've got the correct peak wavelength and spectral bandwidth, I'm not sure about the last question though or how I can quantify if one is a better emitter than the other. Any help would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would interpret "better emitter" as "brighter", meaning more total energy is emitted. You do have relevant information here.

What does the peak wavelength measure? Peak of what?
What does the spectral bandwidth measure? Bandwidth of what?
 
I'm guessing greater energy = better emitter = lower wavelength
 
Question is asked in regards to LEDs
 
Are you saying that longer wavelengths always equal more energy? So the energy given off by a nuclear explosion in gamma rays is less than the energy given off by a glowing coal in the infrared? Are you sure?

Again, what does the peak wavelength measure? Peak of what? What does the spectral bandwidth measure? Bandwidth of what? How are those things defined?

I know it's about LEDs. I'm asking you to think through the meaning of those parameters. "It's the bandwidth" and "it's about LEDs" are not an explanation. What is it that has a width? What are the axes of the associated graph?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top