Peak wavelength and Spectral Bandwidth

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the peak wavelength and spectral bandwidth of GaAs and silicon LEDs at liquid nitrogen and room temperatures. The peak wavelengths calculated are approximately 0.867 μm for GaAs and 1.088 μm for silicon, with spectral bandwidths derived from temperature-dependent equations. Participants express uncertainty regarding the definition of "better emitter," with suggestions that it relates to brightness or total energy emitted. Clarifications are sought on the meanings of peak wavelength and spectral bandwidth, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of these parameters in the context of LEDs. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of defining key terms to assess the performance of different LED materials.
says
Messages
585
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


Calculate the expected peak wavelength and spectral bandwidth (in units of wavelength) of the
emission for both a GaAs and silicon LED at liquid nitrogen temperature (77 K) and room temperature (300 K). Which of these cases would you expect to result in the best emitter and why?

Homework Equations


λg = hc/Eg
λg: maximum wavelength
λg [μm] = 1.24/Eg

Spectral bandwidth = (1.8kbT) / ħ

The Attempt at a Solution


λg: band gap represents minimum energy, or maximum wavelength for which an electron-hole pair can be excited

GaAs Eg: 1.43 eV
Si Eg: 1.14 eV

λg [μm] = 1.24/1.43 = 0.867 μm (maximum wavelength for GaAs)

λg [μm] = 1.24/1.14 = 1.088 μm (maximum wavelength for Si)

---

Spectral bandwidth = (1.8kb*300k) / ħ = 3.928*1013Hz
Expressing this in units of wavelength, I've used the relation between frequency and wavelength:

λ=c/f = c / 3.928*1013Hz
=7.6*10-6m

Spectral bandwidth = (1.8kb*77k) / ħ = 1.008*1013Hz = 2.9*10-5m/s
Expressing this in units of wavelength, I've used the relation between frequency and wavelength:

λ=c/f = c / 1.008*1013Hz
= 2.9*10-5m

So I think I've got the correct peak wavelength and spectral bandwidth, I'm not sure about the last question though or how I can quantify if one is a better emitter than the other. Any help would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would interpret "better emitter" as "brighter", meaning more total energy is emitted. You do have relevant information here.

What does the peak wavelength measure? Peak of what?
What does the spectral bandwidth measure? Bandwidth of what?
 
I'm guessing greater energy = better emitter = lower wavelength
 
Question is asked in regards to LEDs
 
Are you saying that longer wavelengths always equal more energy? So the energy given off by a nuclear explosion in gamma rays is less than the energy given off by a glowing coal in the infrared? Are you sure?

Again, what does the peak wavelength measure? Peak of what? What does the spectral bandwidth measure? Bandwidth of what? How are those things defined?

I know it's about LEDs. I'm asking you to think through the meaning of those parameters. "It's the bandwidth" and "it's about LEDs" are not an explanation. What is it that has a width? What are the axes of the associated graph?
 
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...

Similar threads