Peltier Project: Increasing Performance w/ 50% PWM & Alternating Circuits

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing a drink cooler project using Peltier devices by implementing 50% PWM and alternating circuit switching to enhance performance and battery life. The project aims to use lithium polymer batteries to power four Peltier modules, with considerations for managing high current and voltage requirements. The main inquiry revolves around the feasibility of alternating PWM control between two pairs of Peltier devices to prevent overheating and improve efficiency. Suggestions include using high-frequency SPDT relays, MOSFETs, or logic gates to achieve the desired circuit switching. The conversation also touches on the potential for using a PIC microcontroller to manage PWM outputs without additional components.
NikD1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Peltier Project: 50% PWM --> alternate circuit switching for increased performance?

Hi all,

I have a project where I am making a drink cooler device using four peltier devices which can draw up to 30amps or 24 volts each.

we are considering battery power (pretty ridiculous but anyway..) and were considering Lithium polymer batteries.
http://www.maxpoly.co.uk/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=3&products_id=85
my thinking is that 2 of these could provide 15volts at up to 110 amps (we should be fine with 20-25amps per module) constant current with a capacity of 216000 joules which should last 4-5 cycles.

we are planning to use PWM with a control circuit to monitor temperatures and output the correct voltage which would provide the current giving us the best COP to extend the battery life.
as the peltier devices are very high power and dissipate a lot of heat we would probably only run them at under 0.5 PWM so the high voltage and current is mainly so that we can select the optimum PWM for whatever temperature the device is at.

I was wondering if there was a way to split the circuit in two so that 2 peltiers were separate from the other two and they could be alternately PWM controlled so that while one was off, the other could be on. high frequency 1000Hz + is required as the peltiers do not like low frequency cycling.
this would let use more of the battery performance allowing us to have up to 30V through the devices at the same current by putting the batteries in series as only half the current would be needed.

any thoughts on all of this please? and the main question:what would I use to switch alternately between 2 circuits at high frequency? I am thinking this would be added in series after PWM is applied which would let us control the PWM separately to stop the device overheating.

side question: is there a simple way of powering this device off mains power as high current power supplies are expensive! at the moment we are having to restrict ourselves to low currents

Thanks for your time!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org


i have suggestions which may not help you but give you some ideas.
Actuvally, i am working on a project to control a 1000Hz welding operation where we got bad results due to continuous weld current as output. Harware consistes of of transformer and later to that section with 4 IGBT combinations for switching operation. for example, Two IGBT's are ON at a constant time and a cycle(positive and negative) of current will be drawn for each combination continously. Because of this continuous current production, we have had some problems with realtime weld that had bad spots on welded material after operation. There, we used burst current to stabilize wled electrodes heating from continuous current. for example, we turn on IGBT's for 10 cycles of current and then blank period of one or two cycles to make electrodes cool. This cool period is also depend on previous ten cycle weld current. If the current drwan is more then cool period increases and vice versa and so on.

Does it make any sense? apolozies for non related answer.
 


rama1001 said:
i have suggestions which may not help you but give you some ideas.
Actuvally, i am working on a project to control a 1000Hz welding operation where we got bad results due to continuous weld current as output. Harware consistes of of transformer and later to that section with 4 IGBT combinations for switching operation. for example, Two IGBT's are ON at a constant time and a cycle(positive and negative) of current will be drawn for each combination continously. Because of this continuous current production, we have had some problems with realtime weld that had bad spots on welded material after operation. There, we used burst current to stabilize wled electrodes heating from continuous current. for example, we turn on IGBT's for 10 cycles of current and then blank period of one or two cycles to make electrodes cool. This cool period is also depend on previous ten cycle weld current. If the current drwan is more then cool period increases and vice versa and so on.

Does it make any sense? apolozies for non related answer.

im note really sure how that would apply..

I have been looking around though and while looking up what an IGBT was (not sure i fully understand..) I realized I wanted a high frequency/high power SPDT relay switch or something that would do similar.

Alternativly as I am using a 18f4331 PIC chip, I might be able to use a 2 complimentary PWM outputs set to 50% which I am guessing would work alternately. I am thinking I could then combine this with 2 and gates and buy a new MOSFET so that each circuit has one.

or even easier I could use a single PWM at 50% and use and and gate on one circuit and an or gate on the other.

now is that a better solution to the original problem? and would it be better 2 get 2 high power logic gates or 2 normal logic gates and a new MOSFET? or would there be a way to get the PIC chip to output my signals without buying logic gates? will the logic gates operate fast enough?
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top