Pendulum amplitude after 5 minutes

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about pendulum amplitude after 5 minutes, two pendulums with identical lengths but different materials (aluminum and brass) are compared. The aluminum pendulum's amplitude decreases to half its initial value after 5 minutes, raising questions about the brass pendulum's amplitude. The confusion stems from the assumption that both pendulums would experience the same damping effects due to their similar setups. However, the damping characteristics differ because the materials have different properties affecting energy loss rates. Ultimately, the calculated amplitude for the brass pendulum is determined to be approximately 0.81A, indicating that it does not follow the same amplitude reduction as the aluminum pendulum.
jmm5872
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Suppose one pendulum consists of a 1-meter string with a bob that is an aluminum sphere 2 inches in diameter. A second pendulum consists of a 1-meter string with a bob that is a brass sphere 2 inches in diameter. The two pedulums are set into oscillation at the same time and with the same amplitude A. After 5 minutes of undisturbed oscillation, the aluminum pendulum is oscillating with one half of its initial amplitude. What is the oscillation amplitude of the brass pendulum? Assume that the friction is due to the relative velocity of bob and air and that the instantaneous rate of energy loss is proportional to the square of the velocity of the bob.

The answer is supposed to be .81A.


y(t) = Ae^(t/2\tau)cos(\omegat)


I think I might just be confused about the wording of this problem. I know that the angular frequency of a pendulum only depends on gravity and the length of the string, therefore both pendulums will be exactly the same. So now I tried to plug in 300 seconds to the above equation for t, and set A to .5A. Now I am stuck, I don't know how to get \tau.

Also, this is where my confusion comes in, if after 5 minutes the aluminum bob is oscillating at half its initial amplitude, wouldn't the brass bob be the exact same? Then the answer would be .5A.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top