Pendulum and cart harmonic motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a simple pendulum attached to a cart, where the goal is to determine the amplitude of the cart's motion after the pendulum is released. The initial approach suggested using a relationship between the distances traveled by the pendulum and cart, but it was pointed out that this method lacks proper consideration of energy principles, particularly gravitational potential energy. Key factors, such as the need for proper units and the inclusion of kinetic energy in the analysis, were emphasized as critical to solving the problem accurately. Additionally, the possibility of applying conservation of momentum was proposed as a more effective method for analyzing the system's motion. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying physics concepts to solve the problem.
Frillth
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A simple pendulum of mass m = .28 kg and length L = .65 m is attached to a cart of mass M = 1.0 kg. The mass of the pendulum support is negligible. The cart can roll rreely on a horizontal surface. At t = 0, the pendulum bob is released from rest when the string makes an angle of 10 degrees with the vertical. assume that the resulting motion of the cart relative to the ground is simple harmonic motion. Determine the amplitude of the motion of the cart.

Homework Equations



Not sure.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to solve this, but I had a completely unscientific intuitive guess that the distance pendulum travels * pendulum's mass = distance cart travels * cart's mass:

Horizontal distance between bob at 10 degrees and vertical = .65*sin10

.65*sin10 * .28 = 1*x
x = .032 m

Is this at all close to correct? If not, could somebody please point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to be attempting a conservation of energy approach, which might work, but I'm disturbed about a number of things:

Note: for both energy-like terms... you're using distance times mass. Is that right?

First: For the potential energy of the pendulum you are missing a factor that's pretty important. You have height of the pendulum times that pendulum's mass -- but there's something missing to make it ENERGY. In this case the factor you're missing is known... what is it? hint: It' energy related to height it's gravitational potential energy!) I also suggest you ALWAYS carry the units with your math to be sure your result has units that you want.

Second: Your equation for work done on the cart would also be wrong. Again, your units are off and you're missing a factor... but in this case... do you know that factor? Even more important... is that factor constant over time? Note: Based on the motion of the cart, I don't think it can be! Note: this unknown might make it possibly very difficult to find the distance based on your approach.

Also note: You haven't considered all ways the energy is transferred... you might want to think about kinetic energy of the pendulum and cart.
The big questions about this are:
What is the pendulum doing when the cart is at maximum displacement?
What are the pendulum and cart doing when the pendulum is at it's lowest point?
etc.

I was thinking about the possibility of a conservation of momentum approach. Have you thought of that? I think it's much more promising. You could probably do something cool with the resulting velocity equation of motion...
 
If the cart can move freely along the horizontal direction then the center of mass of the system is at rest along this direction.
I think that this is what you were trying to do, right?. (distance*mass...)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top