Pendulum Damping Force Calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the damping force of a pendulum using Stokes' Law, with specific parameters provided, including the radius, viscosity of air, mass, length, and time period. The user initially calculated the angular velocity and derived a velocity of 0.02688 m/s, leading to an incorrect damping force of 1291 N, which was deemed too large. After realizing a mistake in the viscosity exponent, the user recalculated the damping force to be 1.29 x 10^-7 N, questioning if this value is too small compared to the gravitational force. The conversation highlights the challenges of accurately determining damping forces in low-viscosity environments like air. Accurate calculations and understanding of the forces involved are crucial for resolving discrepancies in results.
geordieman101
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Pendulum Damping Force

Homework Statement


I am attempting to find the damping force of my pendulum using Stokes' Law. However, I am having trouble finding the velocity of the spherical object to get this damping force.
The radius of the sphere is 0.014m, the viscosity of air is 1.82 x10^5, the mass of the object is 0.035kg, the length of the pendulum is 2.3m, the time period is 3.274s
The pendulum was released from an amplitude of 100cm, at an angle of 23.5 degrees or 0.41 radians

Homework Equations


F(damping)=-6πrηv
v=rw
2π/w=T=2πr/v

The Attempt at a Solution


Using 2π/w i managed to get the angular velocity of 1.92rad/s and therefore my calculation for the velocity is 0.02688m/s, and thus my calculation for the damping force as 1291N, but this seems to be too large compared to the weight in the opposite direction of the force being shown via mgsinθ or in this case mgθ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1291N is ridiculous. Isn't the exponent on the viscosity of air number -5, not +5.?
 
yes it is, my bad, but this would give the damping force as 1.29x10^-7N, surely this would be too small compared to 0.14N is what I am getting for the force of mgθ, the force due to gravity also seems incorrect to me as well
 
I get the same thing for the damping force. Air is not very viscous. I don't see anything wrong with your g force either.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top