Pendulum: Energy is conserved but not momentum

AI Thread Summary
In an ideal pendulum, energy is conserved as potential energy transforms into kinetic energy and vice versa, while momentum is not conserved due to the influence of external forces like gravity. This indicates that the pendulum is not an isolated system, yet energy remains conserved because gravity is a conservative force dependent on position. The discussion highlights that when the pendulum moves, energy is transferred to and from the gravitational field, illustrating how external forces can influence energy without altering its conservation. The analogy of money in a bank account is used to explain that energy stored in the gravitational field still belongs to the pendulum. Overall, while momentum fluctuates, the energy conservation principle holds true under these conditions.
greypilgrim
Messages
580
Reaction score
44
Hi.

In an ideal pendulum, energy is conserved. Potential energy gets transformed to kinetic energy and vice versa. However, momentum is not conserved.

The latter means that the pendulum is not an isolated system, which is plausible, since gravity is an external force. But why is energy conserved then? Under what conditions does an external force not change the energy in a system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greypilgrim said:
Under what conditions does an external force not change the energy in a system?
When the force is conservative, i.e. dependent on position only. (This may sound like a tautology, but it is not.) Gravity is a conservative force.
 
In addition the force also must have a potential to be conservative in the usual sense. The Langrangian/Hamiltonian is not explicitly time-dependent and thus energy is conserved (Noether's theorem applied to time-translation invariance).
 
I would say that energy is not conserved. The Earth not only gains and loses some momentum but also some kinetic energy. The momentum is significant but the energy is not. Effectively, therefore, energy of the pendulum appears to be conserved.

Consider also an elastic collision between a ball and the ground. Momentum of the ball is clearly not conserved but kinetic energy appears to be. Can you explain why that is?
 
We can say that the potentian energy of the pendulum is stored in the gravitational field.
When the pendulum is moving upwards, energy is leaving the pendulum and stored in the gravitational field. This is due to the work done by the gravitational force. When the pendulum is moving downwards, energy is leaving the gravitational field and put into the pendulum. Again due to the work done by the gravitational force.
In this sense we can say that the external force changes the energy of the pendulum all the time.
 
We can add that when energy is stored in the gravitational field, it is still belongs to the the pendulum. It is like having money in the bank and not in your wallet. Your money in the bank is still your money.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top