Pendulum problem only the rope breaks

  • Thread starter Thread starter drmumma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum Rope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a swinging man whose rope breaks at a height of 2 feet. Participants emphasize the need to use conservation of energy to determine the velocity at the moment he drops from the swing. They suggest applying projectile motion and linear motion equations to calculate the distance he will land on the ground. There is also mention of the relationship between radians and degrees, but the focus remains on solving for acceleration and velocity. The consensus is to avoid unnecessary complexity and stick to fundamental physics principles for the solution.
drmumma
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Alrighty this problem is making me crazy.
A guy is swinging on a swing where the height above ground=2ft., the length of rope=8ft., mass of guy=100kg and theta=30 degrees. The rope breaks when he is close to the ground... what is the distance that he will land on the ground?
I am so lost, I don't even have a solution in 3 physics books I have...
Do we need arc length at all and convert it to radians... possibly find acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so what's the relation between radians and degrees? ( I prefer radians because they are used as standard measure...you can do it with degree measure too.)

And then find the max height to which the swing rises, use conservation of energy to find the velocity at the instant the man drops from the swing. Then solve using equations of motion.
 
You are my hero! ok awesome so find acceleration via conservation of energy then use perhaps a physical pendulum equation? or simple pendulum equation?
 
drmumma said:
so find acceleration via conservation of energy?

no, velocity when the man leaves the swing.

drmumma said:
physical pendulum equation?

no, read my above post carefully.
Use the projectile and linear motion equations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top