Pendulum velocity using energy forumula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a pendulum at its lowest point after being released from an angle theta. The user initially applied the conservation of energy principle incorrectly, leading to a different formula for velocity than their professor's. The professor's method involved recognizing the change in gravitational potential energy, which decreases as the pendulum descends. The key takeaway is understanding how to account for the gain or loss of kinetic energy relative to potential energy changes. This clarification helps resolve the confusion about the correct application of energy conservation in this scenario.
Garrit
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This problem deals with a pendulum. Imagine you're just letting it dangle (so perpendicular to ground) and you lift it to the side by some angle theta. This point your holding it at will be Point A. You release the pendulum from your grip and want to find out at Point B (where it was originally at, just dangling in a straight line) what the velocity is there.
upload_2017-3-7_22-42-36.png


Homework Equations


[/B]
Since only the work of gravity is being done, I am using Ea = Eb. So the kinetic energy at Point A plus the potential energy at point A equals the kinetic energy at Point B plus the potential energy at point B.
Kinetic = (0.5)(m)v^2 Potential = mgl

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I did (0.5)(m)(0) + mglcos(theta) = (0.5)m(Vb)^2 + mgl
Vb = sqrt(2gl(cos(theta)-1)))

The problem is, I don't think this is right. My professor did this in class and got a different answer.
He did this 0 - mglcos(theta) = (0.5)m(Vb)^2 - mgl -------> Vb = sqrt(2gl(1-cos(theta)))

Why did he subtract? I thought Eb= Ea was kinetic PLUS potential
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know why my picture doesn't show. I drew it (its real simple) and uploaded it. If my wording doesn't make enough sense here it is https://imgur.com/YqxEwFH
 
Garrit said:
I don't know why my picture doesn't show. I drew it (its real simple) and uploaded it. If my wording doesn't make enough sense here it is https://imgur.com/YqxEwFH
Instead of posting a url to some offsite-stored image which can sometimes be "fragile", it's better to upload your image to the PF server. Use the UPLOAD feature (button at the bottom right of the edit window).

This time I'll insert a copy of your image for you.
 
Garrit said:
Why did he subtract? I thought Eb= Ea was kinetic PLUS potential
The gravitational potential energy decreases with height above the Earth's surface. You've chosen coordinates such that the distance increases downwards, so that you should have ΔPE ∝ -Δh.

It's often worthwhile to look at the change in elevation that occurs and ask yourself whether you should be gaining KE from the change in PE or losing KE to PE. Then make sure that your equation reflects this gain or loss for the given change in elevation.
 
Ohh ok. That makes sense. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top