Perfectly inelastic collision (distance)

AI Thread Summary
In a perfectly inelastic collision on a frictionless surface, the initial momentum of the moving object is conserved when it collides with a stationary object. To find the distance traveled after the collision, one must first identify any forces acting against the motion, as these will affect the system's acceleration. If no opposing forces are present, the objects will continue moving indefinitely. For scenarios involving slopes, like a 37-degree incline, the net force must be calculated to determine the system's acceleration. By using the final velocity and acceleration, the distance traveled can then be computed.
complexc25
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Lets say an object with an initial velocity collides with a still object. Collision is perfectly inelastic and the surface is frictionless. How can i know how far it traveled?
I solved for the sum of P final = the sum of P initial, but then i don't know how to relate to distance, all i have is velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have the same problem, but my problem has an upward slope of 37 degrees that the objects (connected after collision) travel up. I wish i knew how to do this!
 
First you need to determine what will slow down the combined mass system. If there is nothing acting against the motion, then the motion will not stop. Once you've determined the net force acting on the system, you can determine the acceleration of the system, and using your newfound velocity, you can find the distance travelled.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

State whether the distance x for the block would be greater/less/same
Replies
25
Views
1K
Perfectly inelastic collision of two moving and rotating disks
Replies
9
Views
2K
Potential Energy - 2D inelastic collision - ballistic pendulum
Replies
10
Views
2K
Transition from Elastic to Inelastic collision
Replies
18
Views
2K
Impulse and perfectly inelastic collision between 2 points
Replies
4
Views
735
Can total KE ever increase for inelastic collisions?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Inelastic collision with an inclined plane
Replies
7
Views
4K
A planet of mass M and an object of mass m
Replies
6
Views
1K
Collision between snooker balls
Replies
3
Views
705
Why is momentum conservation always true in a collision?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top