MHB How do we find the dimensions of a rectangle given its perimeter and diagonal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simonio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perimeter
AI Thread Summary
To find the dimensions of a rectangle given its perimeter and diagonal, start with the perimeter equation, which simplifies to x + y = 17, where x is the width and y is the length. Using the Pythagorean theorem, establish the equation 13^2 = x^2 + y^2. Substitute y with 17 - x to eliminate y, leading to the equation 13^2 = x^2 + (17 - x)^2. This expands and simplifies to the quadratic equation x^2 - 17x + 60 = 0, allowing for the determination of the rectangle's dimensions. The discussion emphasizes the application of algebraic manipulation and the Pythagorean theorem to solve the problem.
Simonio
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi, I can do basic quadratics but don't know how to apply them to the following problems:

The perimeter of a rectangle is 34cm. Given that the diagonal is of length 13cm and the width is \(x \)cm, derive the equation \(x^2-17x+60=0\). hence find the dimensions of the rectangle.

(My first go at using Latex-hope it works!). Not sure how to apply the information about the diagonal and derive equation -if anyone can get me started , I'd be really grateful. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Simonio,

Your $\LaTeX$ works fine, well done!(Clapping)

For your problem, I think it'd be useful to first draw a rectangle and label using variables like $x$ and $y$ to represent its width and length, like what I did as follows:

View attachment 2581
Remember we're given that the perimeter of the rectangle is 34 cm, now, how to add up the perimeter of the rectangle above that its length and width are represented by the variables $y$ and $x$? Surely it is $2x+2y=34$, right? This equation can be simplified by dividing through the both sides of the equation by 2, thus we have

$2x+2y=34$

$x+y=17$(*)

Next, notice that we can form right triangle from the rectangle above and it follows from the Pythagoras theorem that $13^2=x^2+y^2$(**).

Up to this point, we have a total of two equations in terms of two variables, $x$ and $y$ but what we're required to prove is the quadratic equation $x^2-17x+60=0$.

We know there is no $y$ in that equation. So, we need to get rid of $y$ but how? The easiest way is to rewrite the equation (*) as the subject of $y$ and then replace it in the equation (**):

From $x+y=17$(*), we get $ y=17-x$

Replace this $y=17-x$ in the equation (**) we have

$13^2=x^2+(17-x)^2$

Now, can you proceed? We can finish it even without the help of a calculator to find for the values of both $13^2$ and $17^2$!:cool:
 

Attachments

  • application of qe.JPG
    application of qe.JPG
    10.1 KB · Views: 105
Thank you very much Anemone -that's a great help. I thought I needed to use the Pythagoras theorem but wasn't sure. brilliant help! many thanks!
 
Hi Anemone,

Having looked at it I'm still not sure hoe to proceed with the \(17^2\) and the \(13^2\)-how do you get rid of the indices? Thanks.
 
Simonio said:
Hi Anemone,

Having looked at it I'm still not sure hoe to proceed with the \(17^2\) and the \(13^2\)-how do you get rid of the indices? Thanks.

Hmm...I'm less sure if you're familiar with the different of two squares or not...so, if you're not, then please proceed with using a calculator to help you out with the addition. But if you're familiar with it, recall that the difference of two squares is a squared number subtracted from another squared number, and they can be factored according to the identity $x^2-y^2=(x+y)(x-y)$.

We'll see how this is going to help us in this problem:

We know we have $13^2=x^2+(17-x)^2$, we expand the RHS, and collect like terms and then move all terms to either side, we get

$13^2=x^2+17^2-34x+x^2$

$0=2x^2-34x+17^2-13^2$

$2x^2-34x+17^2-13^2=0$

Notice that $17^2-13^2$ is the difference of two squares and they can be simplified fairly easily because they can be represented by other form, which is $17^2-13^2=(17+13)(17-13)$. So,

$2x^2-34x+17^2-13^2=0$ becomes

$2x^2-34x+(17+13)(17-13)=0$

$2x^2-34x+(30)(4)=0$

Divide through the equation by 2 we ended up with

$x^2-17x+(30)(2)=0$ or

$x^2-17x+60=0$ and we're done!(Sun)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top