Period of A Pendulum With Moveable Mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance 'd' needed to adjust the period of a pendulum clock to 2.5 seconds, given its current period of 3.5 seconds. Participants are confused about the correct interpretation of the variable 'L' in the period formula and how to apply the Parallel Axis Theorem for the system's moment of inertia. There is a consensus that 'L' refers to the distance from the pivot to the center of mass, not the total length of the rod. Several attempts to calculate 'd' yield incorrect results, highlighting the importance of correctly applying formulas for moment of inertia and center of mass. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding the underlying physics principles to solve the problem accurately.
Wreak_Peace
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The figure below shows the pendulum of a clock in your grandmother's house. The uniform rod of length L = 2 m has a mass m = 0.8 kg. Attached to the rod is a uniform disk of mass M = 1.2 kg and radius 0.15 m. The clock is constructed to keep perfect time if the period of the pendulum is exactly 3.5 s.

a) What should the distance 'd' be so that the period of the pendulum is 2.5 seconds?

b)Suppose that the pendulum clock loses 5.00 min/d. To make sure your grandmother will not be late for her quilting parties, you decide to adjust the clock back to its proper period. How far and in what direction should you move the disk to ensure that the clock will keep perfect time?

14-p-075.gif


Homework Equations



Parallel Axis Theorem: I = Icm + MR2
I of a rod around it's edge = (ML2)/3
I of a disk = (MR2)/2

Period of a physical pendulum = T = 2∏√(I/Lmg)

The Attempt at a Solution



The I of the entire system should be I= (ML2)/3 + (M(R+d)2)/2
We are solving for d, with T = 2.5 seconds, so we plug this in for our equation for period.

T = 2∏√(I/Lmg)

T = 2∏√(((ML2)/3 + (M(R+d)2)/2)/Lmg)

Where I am stuck, however, is what would I use for 'L' in the denominator of the equation for the period. When I assume it is 2 meters, the length of the entire stick, I get 2.8m for d, which doesn't make sense. mR is the mass of the rod, md is the mass of the disk.

I got that answer by rearranging for d.
I end up with T^2 *L*mg/(4∏2) = I

T^2 *L*mg/(4∏2) =
(mR *L2)/3 + (md (d+r)2/2)

Then, 2(T^2 *L*mg/(4∏2) - (mR *L2)/3)/md = (d+r)2

I plugged in numbers for everything that is given, and end up with 8.565 = (d+.15)2, and by solving that, I get ~2.8m, which would mean the disk is off the rod.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does ##L## mean? You cannot just plug random numbers in for it. Find out.
 
voko said:
What does ##L## mean? You cannot just plug random numbers in for it. Find out.

I assumed L was 2 meters because that was the length of the rod. Is L the distance from the center of mass to the pivot point?
 
Yes it is. What is it here?

As a general note, do not guess anything. If some symbol in a formula is obscure, find out what it is exactly. These days, with the Internet, Google and Wiki, it is not difficult at all, so you don't have a valid excuse for not doing that.
 
So, because we don't know how far the disk will be, for calculating the center of mass,
Xm = .8*1 + d*1.2
and I got .3411m, which is also incorrect, though much more reasonable.

I think I was incorrect when stating the I of the disk, I stated the I of a disk around it's center + the M*d^2, due to the parallel axis theorem. The moment of inertia of this disk can be treated as the same as a point mass, so the I of the disk will only be m*d^2, not m*d^2 + m*r^2.

Using that, I got an answer of .359 m, which is also incorrect.
 
The formula for the center of mass should be ## X_m = \dfrac {m_{rod} L_{rod} / 2 + m_{disk} d} { m_{rod} + m_{disk} } ##. I do not think this is quite what you got.

I do not see your formula for the total moment of inertia, but I disagree with this: "the moment of inertia of this disk can be treated as the same as a point mass".

Show your working in full, it is difficult to help you otherwise.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top