Period of Oscillation for a Meter Stick Suspended by a Light String

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the period of oscillation for a meter stick suspended by a light string. Initial attempts using the formulas T=2pi*sqrt(L/g) and w=sqrt(g/l) were deemed incorrect. Participants noted that additional information, such as the masses of the string and meter stick, is typically necessary for accurate calculations. The instructor confirmed that the problem is solvable with the given parameters, suggesting that the alignment of the string and meter stick may be a key factor. Clarification on the setup and assumptions is essential for reaching a solution.
ness9660
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
A meter stick, suspended at one end by a 0.502m long light string, is set into oscillation. Determine the period of oscillation in seconds.

At first I thought this would be a rather simple problem, so I did T=2pi*sqrt(L/g) but apparently this is very wrong.
Then I tried w=sqrt(g/l) T=(2pi)/w but this seems to be wrong as well.

But I can see no other way to do this problem using just the length and g.

Can anyone offer any insight into solving this problem?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a physical pendulum.U should be given the masses of the string & the meter stick,too.Something is either fishy,or is something i just don't see.

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
This is a physical pendulum.U should be given the masses of the string & the meter stick,too.Something is either fishy,or is something i just don't see.

Daniel.


My instructor said the problem is solvable, but yeah, all we get is the length of the string and g.
 
ness9660 said:
but apparently this is very wrong.

In what way?
 
ness,

Do you think your instructor was picturing the string and the meter stick being in line with each other. If so, I think you can solve this.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top