Period of Pendulum When Moving Axis Closer to COM

  • Thread starter Thread starter chewytess
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm
AI Thread Summary
When the axis of rotation of a physical pendulum is moved closer to the center of mass (COM), the period of rotation actually becomes shorter, contrary to the initial assumption that it would be longer. The correct relationship indicates that the period is inversely proportional to the distance from the center of rotation to the COM. The commonly used formula for the period of a pendulum is T = 2π√(g/L), where L is the distance from the pivot to the COM. Therefore, moving the pivot closer to the COM reduces the effective length and results in a shorter period. Testing this relationship can be done easily with a simple pendulum setup.
chewytess
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the axis of rotation of a physical pendulum is placed closer to the COM, is the period of rotation longer? If it originally starts .5m from the COM the moves .3M from the COM the peroid shoud be longer right? I keep getting a longer period when the axis of roatation is placed closer to the COM, but it just deosnt seem right


Homework Equations



t=2pi*(sqrt(I/mgh)
I=(1/12)Ml^2

The Attempt at a Solution


mass is unknown
L= 1m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chewytess said:

Homework Statement



If the axis of rotation of a physical pendulum is placed closer to the COM, is the period of rotation longer? If it originally starts .5m from the COM the moves .3M from the COM the peroid shoud be longer right? I keep getting a longer period when the axis of roatation is placed closer to the COM, but it just deosnt seem right


Homework Equations



t=2pi*(sqrt(I/mgh)
I=(1/12)Ml^2

The Attempt at a Solution


mass is unknown
L= 1m

I'm not familiar with that form of the equation. It seems to me the more common form is
T =2\pi\sqrt{g/L}
for T = period
L = arm length (i.e. distance from center of rotation to center of mass)
g= acceleration due to gravity

As with the equation you cite, period is inversely proportional to arm length, so your expectation is wrong and your calculation is correct.

The period-arm length relationship is easy to test with any crude pendulum (say you cell phone hanging on its charging wire).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top