Period of small oscillations for a pendulum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the period of small oscillations for a pendulum consisting of a 250 mm rigid rod with two identical 50 mm solid spheres attached at its lower end. The calculated periods for oscillations perpendicular and along the line of centers are 1.011 s and 1.031 s, respectively. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying the parallel axis theorem to determine the moment of inertia, which is crucial for accurate results. The conversation reveals confusion regarding the mass variable and the correct interpretation of the pendulum's configuration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the parallel axis theorem
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia calculations
  • Familiarity with pendulum motion and oscillation principles
  • Basic grasp of physical pendulum dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the parallel axis theorem and its application in pendulum problems
  • Learn how to derive the moment of inertia for composite objects
  • Study the derivation of the period formula for physical pendulums
  • Explore Hyperphysics resources on physical pendulums for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and oscillatory motion, as well as educators seeking to clarify pendulum dynamics and moment of inertia concepts.

mrojc
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

A pendulum consists of a light rigid rod of length 250 mm, with two identical uniform solid spheres of radius of radius 50 mm attached one on either side of its lower end. Find the period of small oscillations (a) perpendicular to the line of centres and (b) along it.[/B]

Homework Equations

Equation I have come across is

db205bb67d7f7f685b18b19b451ac429.png
[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution

From the parallel axis theorum the moment of inertia of a pendulum and sphere is mr2+2/5mr2. As there is two spheres I added on another 2/5 mr2. The answers for both parts are (a) 1.011 s and (b) 1.031 s. I have gotten answers close to, but not quite these answers, ie 1.2 s or 1.3 s. I feel like this is an easy question and that I'm after doing something stupid, so any guidance would be greatly appreciated.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello mro, :welcome:

Just so we are really talking about the same pendulum:

upload_2015-11-21_21-24-45.png

you didn't tell us what m is and I don't understand how this is a pendulum. Where is the axis of rotation ?
How can it oscillate along the "line of centres"? and perpendicular to it ?
 
Hi BvU,
We weren't given m, and it doesn't make much sense to me either. When I read the question initially, that was the picture I had in my head. However, from reading it again, I think they're attached on the same end? Just simply because it said "one on either side of its lower end," not ends. To be honest, the book is very poorly worded at times. As regards to m, could it not be canceled with the lower line m in the equation? Maybe it's total mass of the system? I apologise for the vagueness of the question by the way, it's not very clear.
 
@BvU I think the two cases have the spheres at the same end of the rod, the difference being the plane of oscillation:

Fig1.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
@gneill Hi, thanks for the diagram, that's the picture I had in my head. Am I on the right track with my equations or is there something I'm forgetting about?
 
mrojc said:
@gneill Hi, thanks for the diagram, that's the picture I had in my head. Am I on the right track with my equations or is there something I'm forgetting about?
I think you're on the right track, but you should be careful about your moment of inertia expressions. Be sure to carefully account for the displacement distance in the parallel axis theorem for each case.

I just did a quick calculation, and I suspect that they may have forgotten to include both spheres when they calculated their "given" answers. Of course, it's also possible that I've mucked up, too! So let's see what you get (show your work), and in the meantime I'll go over my own work.

Edit: Nope, I mucked up :oops: I'm seeing their results now.
 
Ok, just want to double check something: for R in the period equation, is that L/2? Or do I have to include the radius of the spheres in that R too? Thanks for all your help so far by the way, really appreciate it! :)
 
mrojc said:
Ok, just want to double check something: for R in the period equation, is that L/2? Or do I have to include the radius of the spheres in that R too? Thanks for all your help so far by the way, really appreciate it! :)
The R in your formula is the distance from the center of mass of the physical pendulum to the pivot point. See:

Hyperphysics: Physical Pendulum
 
I seem to be making a mess of things :H I'm inputting 0.125 m for the moment of inertia of the pendulum and 0.05 m for the spheres, and I am not getting the answers out. I'm definitely doing something really stupid and I'll be so annoyed when I figure out what it is!
 
  • #10
mrojc said:
I seem to be making a mess of things :H I'm inputting 0.125 m for the moment of inertia of the pendulum and 0.05 m for the spheres, and I am not getting the answers out. I'm definitely doing something really stupid and I'll be so annoyed when I figure out what it is!
I'm not sure how you're coming up with a value for the moment of inertia alone, since the sphere mass was not specified. The mass cancels out eventually in the period formula though.

Why don't you share the details of your work? Maybe someone can spot where it goes awry.
 
  • #11
https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xat1/v/t34.0-12/12282819_10204148176339731_1402560635_n.jpg?oh=e147dab589d46be63cf24a1a026741fc&oe=56535411
I apologise for this being sideways but this was my calculations part.
 
  • #12
This problem seems to hinge on obtaining the correct moment of inertia for the given setup, so let's focus on that.

I'm not understanding the moment of inertia you've used in your period formula. Can you type it out and explain the variables? If r is the radius of a sphere, then what is the variable for the offset a la parallel axis theorem?
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K