Period of Star When Diameter Shrinks

  • Thread starter Thread starter lew44
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Period Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the new rotational period of a star after its diameter shrinks to 0.330 times its original size. The key equation used is the conservation of angular momentum, where the initial and final moments of inertia are equated. Participants clarify that the period must be expressed in days, emphasizing the importance of unit consistency throughout the calculations. A misunderstanding about rearranging the equation led to incorrect results, but guidance was provided to correctly isolate the variable for the new period. Ultimately, the focus is on correctly applying the conservation principle to find the new period after the diameter change.
lew44
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




The mass of a star is 1.370×1031 kg and it performs one rotation in 38.10 day. Find its new period (in days) if the diameter suddenly shrinks to 0.330 times its present size. Assume a uniform mass distribution before and after.

Homework Equations


Ii * Wi = If * Wf
2/5MR^2 * 1rot/38.1 days = (2/5MR^2*0.330^2) * Wf


The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure what cancels out

I thought it would be something like

1rot/38.1days = .330^2 * Wf

solve for Wf

But that didn't work. .241s was not correct
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take care of the units. rot/day is not second.

ehild
 
I still don't understand because if I change the bottom number to seconds I still have rot/sec and that is not seconds. Plus it asks for the period in days so doesn't that factor in?
 
wi and wf have the same units.

ehild
 
it asks for the new period in days! I am not sure what to do with this problem
 
I am getting like 2198.249 as an answer.
 
You replaced wi by 1rot/39.1days. Then you should do the same with wf: wf=1rot/xdays.

Rewrite your equation

1rot/38.1days = .330^2 * Wf

as

1rot/38.1days = 0.330^2* (1rot/x days)--->1/38.1 =0.330^2/x.

Solve for x.

ehild
 
thank you, i think i just didn't understand that you needed the x on the other side of the equation and that is what was giving me such a large answer
 
Back
Top