Periodic Boundaries in Molecular Dynamics Simulations

AI Thread Summary
Periodic boundaries in molecular dynamics simulations are essential for modeling large, "infinite" particle systems by confining particles. To ensure that the outcomes of a finite particle system align with those of a periodic system, one approach is to increase the size of the particle system and compare results. Doubling the system size can help determine if the outcomes converge, indicating that the periodic boundary conditions are effectively simulating the desired molecular behavior. Experimentation is crucial in validating the accuracy of the simulation results. Ultimately, the size of the particle system must be sufficient to replicate the behavior observed in periodic simulations.
sqljunkey
Messages
181
Reaction score
8
In molecular dynamics people use periodic boundaries to confine particles being simulated. I read here that they are used to simulate large "infinite" particle systems. How can I know that the periodic boundary is simulating actual molecular outcomes for a finite particle system that had a large number of atoms?

In other words, is there a way to find how large my particle system has to be to replicate the same outcome that I would get for a periodic system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing you can do is let the experiment decide !
 
sqljunkey said:
In molecular dynamics people use periodic boundaries to confine particles being simulated. I read here that they are used to simulate large "infinite" particle systems. How can I know that the periodic boundary is simulating actual molecular outcomes for a finite particle system that had a large number of atoms?

In other words, is there a way to find how large my particle system has to be to replicate the same outcome that I would get for a periodic system?
Redo the calculation with double the size system and see how the answers compare.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top