Perturbation of a Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculations related to the perturbation of a magnetic field and the energy levels of a quantum system. The user expresses uncertainty about their final answer, suspecting that energy should decrease rather than increase when split. They detail their calculations for both ground and excited energy levels, including first and second-order perturbations, ultimately arriving at a change in energy, ΔE. Feedback from other participants suggests there may be a sign error in the user's calculations, but overall, the work appears sound. The user is encouraged to double-check specific calculations for accuracy.
Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Could someone please see if my working are correct for this question, I have never actually done a question of this nature before, and after reading up about the derivation on the perturbation I thought I give ago and apply, my final answer dose not seem correct, as I believe the energy is suppose to decrease not increase when split.

I have attached a picture of the question due to the large content
imageedit_9_4352134555.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


My working as follows

a) Ground Energy Level

Unperturbed Energy level
$$E_0^{(0)}=-h\bot $$
First Order Perturbed Ground Energy Level
$$E_0^{(1)}=\langle 0|\hat{H}|0\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1&-1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}h\bot &0\\ 0&-h\bot \end{pmatrix}\:\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1\\ 1\end{pmatrix}=\frac{1}{2}\left(h\bot -h\bot \right)=0 $$

First Excited Energy level

perturbed Energy level
$$E_1^{0}=h\bot $$
First Order Perturbed First Energy Level
$$E_1^{(1)}=\langle 1|\hat{H}|1\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1&1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}h\bot \:&0\\ \:0&-h\bot \:\end{pmatrix}\:\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1\\ \:1\end{pmatrix}=\frac{1}{2}\left(h\bot -h\bot \right)=0$$

$$E_0\approx -h\bot +\left(\frac{h\parallel }{h\bot }\right)^2E_0^{(2)} $$

$$E_1\approx h\bot +\left(\frac{h\parallel }{h\bot }\right)^2E_1^{(2)}$$

b)
Ground state second order perturbed
$$E_0^{\left(2\right)}=\frac{\left|\langle1^{0}|\hat{H_1}|0^{(0)}\rangle\right|^2}{E_0^{\left(0\right)}-E_1^{\left(0\right)}}$$

$$\langle 1^{(0)}|\hat{H_1}|0^{(0)}\rangle= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(1,1\right)\begin{pmatrix}h\bot &0\\ 0&-h\bot \end{pmatrix}\:\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1\\ -1\end{pmatrix}=\frac{1}{2}\left(h\bot -h\bot \right)=0$$

$$E_0^{(2)}=0$$

First Excited state second order perturbed

$$E_0^{\left(2\right)}=\frac{\left|\langle0^{0}|\hat{H_1}|1^{(0)}\rangle\right|^2}{E_1^{\left(0\right)}-E_0^{\left(0\right)}} $$

$$ \langle 1^{(0)}|\hat{H_1}|0^{(0)}\rangle =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(1,-1\right)\begin{pmatrix}h\bot &0\\ 0&-h\bot \end{pmatrix}\:\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1\\ 1\end{pmatrix}=h\bot$$

$$E_1^{\left(2\right)}=\frac{h\bot }{2}$$

$$E_1=h\bot+\left(\frac{h\parallel }{h\bot }\right)^2\frac{h\bot }{2}$$

c)
$$\Delta E=E_1-E_0$$

$$\Delta E=h\bot +\left(\frac{h\parallel }{h\bot }\right)^2\:\frac{h\bot }{2}+h\bot =2h\bot +\left(\frac{h\parallel \:}{h\bot \:}\right)^2\:\frac{h\bot \:}{2}$$

$$\Delta E=2T+\left(\frac{0.1}{1}\right)^2\cdot \frac{1}{2\:}=2.005$$

As mention I do not believe this to be correct , If possible could someone please point out my mistake.
 

Attachments

  • imageedit_9_4352134555.png
    imageedit_9_4352134555.png
    30.2 KB · Views: 387
Physics news on Phys.org
Taylor_1989 said:
b)
Ground state second order perturbed
$$\langle 1^{(0)}|\hat{H_1}|0^{(0)}\rangle= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(1,1\right)\begin{pmatrix}h\bot &0\\ 0&-h\bot \end{pmatrix}\:\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1\\ -1\end{pmatrix}=\frac{1}{2}\left(h\bot -h\bot \right)=0$$
Check this. Looks like a sign error in the calculation. Otherwise, it generally looks good.
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
Check this. Looks like a sign error in the calculation. Otherwise, it generally looks good.
Ah, thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top