Perturbed Hamiltonian and its affect on the eigenvalues

pondzo
Messages
168
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



ps4 QM.PNG


Homework Equations



$$E_n^{(2)}=\sum_{k\neq n}\frac{|H_{kn}'|^2}{E_n^{(0)}-e_k^{(0)}}$$

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure where to start here. The question doesn't give any information about the unperturbed Hamiltonian. Some guidance on the direction would be great! Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by writing out ##H_T = H_0 + H'##, where ##H_T## is the total Hamiltonian, the matrix of which is given in the question, ##H_0## the unperturbed Hamiltonian whose elements do not contain ##\lambda##, and ##H'## the perturbation term which is proportional to ##\lambda##.
 
Hi blue_leaf! Thanks for that, I just realized that I interpreted the question wrong. I thought the matrix given was only the unperturbed Hamiltonian.

So I have separated it into its un/pertrubed matrices. I just don't think I understand what the question is asking, when it says the change in eigenvalues.

##E_1\approx E_1^{(0)}+E_1^{(1)}+E_1^{(2)}##
##~~~~~=E_0+0-\frac{4}{7}E_0\lambda^2##

##E_2\approx E_2^{(0)}+E_2^{(1)}+E_2^{(2)}##
##~~~~~=8E_0+0+\frac{4}{7}E_0\lambda^2##

##E_3\approx E_3^{(0)}+E_3^{(1)}+E_3^{(2)}##
##~~~~~=3E_0+E_0\lambda+0##

##E_4\approx E_4^{(0)}+E_4^{(1)}+E_4^{(2)}##
##~~~~~=7E_0+0+0##

So are the changes in the eigenvalues ##-\frac{4}{7}E_0\lambda^2,~\frac{4}{7}E_0\lambda^2,~E_0\lambda \text{ and } 0## respectively ?
 
I think the full expressions of the new energies are what the questions asks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top