MHB Pharaoh's Taylor series question from Yahoo Answers

CaptainBlack
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Part 1 of Pharaoh's Taylor series and modified Euler question from Yahoo Answers

consider van der pol's equation
y" - 0.2(1-y^2)y' + y = 0 y(0)=0.1 y'(0)=0.1
1)
You are asked to find the approximate solution for this problem using the Taylor series
method. Your expansion should include the first three non-zero terms and you should
work to six decimal places accuracy. First find the approximate solutions for both y (0.1)
and y’(0.1) using the first three non-zero terms of Taylor series expansion for each
function and then use this information to calculate the approximate solution at x = 0.2.
The Taylor series expansion about \(t=0\) is of the form:
\(y(t)=y(0)+y'(0)t+\frac{y''(0)t^2}{2}+.. \)​
We are given \(y(0)\) and \(y'(0)\) in the initial condition, and so from the equation we have:
\(y''(0) = 0.2(1-(y(0))^2)-y(0)=0.2(1-0.1^2)-0.1=-0.0802\)​
So the Taylor series about \(t=0\) is:
\(y(t)=0.1+0.1t-0.0401t^2+... \)​
and using the first three terms of this we have \(y(0.1)\approx 0.109599\), Also:
\(y'(t)=0.1-0.0802t+...\)​
and so \(y'(0.1) \approx 0.09198\)Now the Taylor expansion about \(t=0.1\) is:

\(y(t)=y(0.1)+(t-0.1)y'(0.1)+\frac{(t-0.1)^2y''(0.1)}{2}+...\)​
where \(y''(0.1)=0.2\left(1-(y(0.1))^2\right)y'(0.1)-y(0.1)=-0.08178796\).So:

\(y(0.2)\approx 0.109599+0.1\times 0.0198-0.1^2\times 0.8178796 = 0.108789 \) to 6 six DP​
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
.2)
Next, the modified Euler method can be used to find the approximate solution for this problem. The modified Euler method is given by:

\(y_{n+1}=y_n+hf(x_n+\frac{h}{2},y_n+\frac{h}{2}f(x_n,y_n))\)

where \(f(x,y)=y"-0.2(1-y^2)y'+y\).

Using \(h=0.1\) and starting with \(y_0=0.1\), we can calculate the values of \(y_1\) and \(y_2\) as follows:

\(y_1\approx 0.1+0.1\left(0.1+\frac{0.1}{2}\left(0.1-0.2(1-0.1^2)0.1+0.1\right)\right)\approx 0.109625\)

\(y_2\approx 0.109625+0.1\left(0.2+\frac{0.1}{2}\left(0.2-0.2(1-0.109625^2)0.2+0.109625\right)\right)\approx 0.10961\)

So, the approximate solution at \(x=0.2\) using the modified Euler method is \(y(0.2)\approx 0.10961\). This is slightly different from the value obtained using the Taylor series method, but both methods provide a good approximation to the actual solution.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top