MHB Pharaoh's Taylor series question from Yahoo Answers

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving van der Pol's equation using two numerical methods: the Taylor series and the modified Euler method. The Taylor series expansion yields approximate values of y(0.1) as 0.109599 and y(0.2) as 0.108789, calculated to six decimal places. The modified Euler method provides an approximate solution of y(0.2) as 0.10961, which is slightly different from the Taylor series result. Both methods demonstrate effective approaches to approximating solutions for the given differential equation. The comparison highlights the reliability of these numerical techniques in solving complex equations.
CaptainBlack
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Part 1 of Pharaoh's Taylor series and modified Euler question from Yahoo Answers

consider van der pol's equation
y" - 0.2(1-y^2)y' + y = 0 y(0)=0.1 y'(0)=0.1
1)
You are asked to find the approximate solution for this problem using the Taylor series
method. Your expansion should include the first three non-zero terms and you should
work to six decimal places accuracy. First find the approximate solutions for both y (0.1)
and y’(0.1) using the first three non-zero terms of Taylor series expansion for each
function and then use this information to calculate the approximate solution at x = 0.2.
The Taylor series expansion about \(t=0\) is of the form:
\(y(t)=y(0)+y'(0)t+\frac{y''(0)t^2}{2}+.. \)​
We are given \(y(0)\) and \(y'(0)\) in the initial condition, and so from the equation we have:
\(y''(0) = 0.2(1-(y(0))^2)-y(0)=0.2(1-0.1^2)-0.1=-0.0802\)​
So the Taylor series about \(t=0\) is:
\(y(t)=0.1+0.1t-0.0401t^2+... \)​
and using the first three terms of this we have \(y(0.1)\approx 0.109599\), Also:
\(y'(t)=0.1-0.0802t+...\)​
and so \(y'(0.1) \approx 0.09198\)Now the Taylor expansion about \(t=0.1\) is:

\(y(t)=y(0.1)+(t-0.1)y'(0.1)+\frac{(t-0.1)^2y''(0.1)}{2}+...\)​
where \(y''(0.1)=0.2\left(1-(y(0.1))^2\right)y'(0.1)-y(0.1)=-0.08178796\).So:

\(y(0.2)\approx 0.109599+0.1\times 0.0198-0.1^2\times 0.8178796 = 0.108789 \) to 6 six DP​
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
.2)
Next, the modified Euler method can be used to find the approximate solution for this problem. The modified Euler method is given by:

\(y_{n+1}=y_n+hf(x_n+\frac{h}{2},y_n+\frac{h}{2}f(x_n,y_n))\)

where \(f(x,y)=y"-0.2(1-y^2)y'+y\).

Using \(h=0.1\) and starting with \(y_0=0.1\), we can calculate the values of \(y_1\) and \(y_2\) as follows:

\(y_1\approx 0.1+0.1\left(0.1+\frac{0.1}{2}\left(0.1-0.2(1-0.1^2)0.1+0.1\right)\right)\approx 0.109625\)

\(y_2\approx 0.109625+0.1\left(0.2+\frac{0.1}{2}\left(0.2-0.2(1-0.109625^2)0.2+0.109625\right)\right)\approx 0.10961\)

So, the approximate solution at \(x=0.2\) using the modified Euler method is \(y(0.2)\approx 0.10961\). This is slightly different from the value obtained using the Taylor series method, but both methods provide a good approximation to the actual solution.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K