Phase Change & Temperature: What's the Difference?

AI Thread Summary
A substance can either change temperature or undergo a phase change when it absorbs or releases heat, but not both simultaneously. During a phase change, such as ice melting, the temperature remains constant despite the addition of heat. This heat is used to break intermolecular forces rather than increase kinetic energy. The process illustrates that temperature changes only occur after the phase change is complete. Understanding this distinction is crucial in thermodynamics.
nothing123
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
"When a substance absorbs or releases heat, one of two things can happen: either its temperature changes or it will undergo a phase change but not both at the same time"

Can someone clarify this statement? During a phase change, isn't what's going on really just increasing the kinetic energy of the molecules so intermolecular forces break and thus increasing the temperature of the matter?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Phase change occurs in one temperature - like ice melting. As long as there is a mixture of ice and water adding heat will melt the ice, but temperature of the mixture remains constant. It is breaking of the forces that kept molecules in solid (liquid) together that consumes the heat.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top