Phase constant in wave propagations: what are its effects?

AI Thread Summary
The phase constant (BETA) in wave propagation for lossy media indicates the phase shift per meter traveled, while the attenuation factor (ALFA) quantifies signal loss over distance. Although BETA and ALFA are mathematically independent, they are both influenced by the same material properties and wave frequency, linking them physically. Increasing the loss in a medium reduces the wavelength (increasing BETA) and simultaneously raises the attenuation factor (increasing ALFA). Understanding the interplay between these factors is crucial for analyzing wave behavior in different media. The discussion highlights the complexity of wave propagation and the importance of both constants in electromagnetic theory.
Ionito
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
In the electromagnetism theory, the phase factor or constant (usually BETA) in wave propagation for lossy medium has the unit rad/m.

I understood that it must be interpreted as the amount of phase shift that occurs as the wave travels one meter.

However, differently of the attenuation factor (usually ALFA), I cannot see examples relating the phase factor to the distance. In other words, we can see the signal attenuation as the form of 8.69*ALFA*d, where d is the distance between the sender and the receiver. However, this distance "d" is not used in conjunction with the phase factor BETA. Is it right? Is there any correlation between BETA and the signal attenuation? If not, what are the effects of having a HIGH and LOW BETA?

Can anyone provide me a complete example of the total attenuation (in dBs), given ALFA, BETA, frequency, and distance d, for a plane wave propagating in a lossy medium?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wave number/vector is a complex quantity. The real part dictates the phase progression with regard to spatial displacement. This is your \beta. The imaginary part gives rise to an attenuating behavior with regards to space, this is your \alpha loss. They are both related with the position in space/distance traveled since they both come out of the phase term:
e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}
So the real part will dictate the phase progression and the effective wavelength of the wave while the imaginary part dictates the attenuation of the wave. Both of these are dependent on not only the physical properties of the medium of propagation but also the frequency of the wave as well since the wave number is defined as:
k = |\mathbf{k}|^{\frac{1}{2}} = \omega\sqrt{\epsilon\mu}
 
Thank you for the answer. Besides the velocity, wavelength, and phase shift effects caused by different BETAs of lossy media, is it possible (and how) that these BETAs are also related to the attenuation behavior (a secondary factor in addition to the ALFA factor)?
 
Ionito said:
Thank you for the answer. Besides the velocity, wavelength, and phase shift effects caused by different BETAs of lossy media, is it possible (and how) that these BETAs are also related to the attenuation behavior (a secondary factor in addition to the ALFA factor)?

If you are talking about \beta and \alpha in a strictly mathematical sense, then no, there is no relation. However, they are derived from the same material properties and frequency of the wave by the fact that they come from the wave number, defined above. So the two are linked physicaly by the fact that they are directly determined by the material properties of your surrounding medium. If we had a dielectric of a given permittivity and permeability, the introduction of loss, without modifying its dielectric constant (real part of the permittivity), results in the shortening of the wavelength as the square root of the permittivity increases when we increase its magnitude.

So increasing the loss of the material, via the manipulation of the material's conductivity, will decrease the wavelength (increase \beta) and increase the attenuation factor (increase \alpha).
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top