Phase Delay Changes with Physical Length Changes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of the S11 reflection coefficient in relation to the physical length of a transmission line. As additional length is added between the reference plane and a short circuit, the phase angle of S11 decreases, which may seem counterintuitive since longer lines typically suggest larger phase angles. The explanation lies in the double transit time delay of the reflected signal, causing S11 to represent an earlier phase of the incident wave. The Smith Chart illustrates this relationship by summing the incident wave and the reflection coefficient, leading to a more negative phase angle as line length increases. Ultimately, the phase angle reflects the entire system's behavior rather than just the distance from input to termination.
jasonleroy
Messages
21
Reaction score
6
Hopefully I can word this correctly. Consider viewing S11 of a short on a smith chart. It starts at the left and moves clockwise around the edge. If you then add a small length of line between the reference plane and the short, the phase angle wraps further around the outside in the clockwise direction.

Question: Why does the phase angle of S11 get smaller with more physical length added to the line? I'm aware of the formulas to predict this, but what is the "physical" explanation?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
jasonleroy said:
Why does the phase angle of S11 get smaller with more physical length added to the line?
Such a seemingly simple question. There must be a really simple answer.

The first point to make is that port1, at any particular frequency, has a reflection coefficient called S11. The reflected signal S11 is measured relative to the incident “unit vector” wave on port1. The incident wave and the reflected wave are directional and so are treated as independent for the scattering matrix.

The Smith Chart on the other hand sums the voltages and currents to show what lumped model a line of that length and termination will appear to be at that frequency. The Smith Chart will be showing you the sum of the incident unit vector, Cos(0) = 1, and S11. That is (1 + S11).

So now the answer to your question. There is a double transit time delay in the reflected signal path, so S11 is an older sample of the port1 incident wave. That means it will have an earlier phase and so for short lines, (less than ¼ of a wavelength), the longer the line the more negative is the phase of S11.

There may have been a confusing complexity in that S11 is measured as an outward traveling wave, while a short circuited line reverses the voltage but the current continues to flow in the same physical direction. I believe those two inversions cancel.
 
Thanks for the response. What seems to be counter-intuitive to me is that a line of longer physical length shows up as having a smaller phase angle than the original. In my mind, longer length = larger phase angle. However, I must be thinking of it from the wrong perspective. The phase angle is a result of the entire system, not a measure of length from input to termination.
 
jasonleroy said:
What seems to be counter-intuitive to me is that a line of longer physical length shows up as having a smaller phase angle than the original.
It also depends on what you mean by the word "smaller". Is that closer to zero, or more negative?
Can you specify the system and show the equation that demonstrates your observation, over what range of lengths?
 
I suppose the simplest example would be measuring a perfect short. If there's no distance between you and the short, S11 is 1∠180°. Now, if you add a length equivalent to 30 degrees for example, you have a new S11 of 1∠120°. In my simplistic way of thinking about it, why isn't it 1∠240°? You are, after all, adding length and the signal is traveling further. There is obviously a fundamental flaw in the way I'm conceptualizing what's happening (the professor's answer was the reflected wave has a negative sign, so that is why you subtract the phase length Γin = ΓL*e-j2Φ ). I willing to accept that that's the way the math is set-up, but why does that happen?
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top