B Phase difference in a transformer

AI Thread Summary
When connecting two coils, one energized by an AC power supply, the induced emf in the second coil shows a 90-degree phase difference due to the rate of change of flux. However, when using an iron core transformer, both primary and secondary coil traces appear in phase. This difference is attributed to the iron core's influence on the magnetic coupling between the coils. The phase relationship may also be affected by the oscilloscope's triggering settings, which can misrepresent the phase if not set correctly. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate phase analysis in transformer applications.
MalachiK
Messages
137
Reaction score
4
Today I took two coils and connected one of them (coil A) to an AC power supply. I held the second coil (coil B) close to the first one and then connected them both to a dual trace CRO. As expected, an emf was induced in coil B and the traces on the scope were 90 degrees out of phase. As I understand it, this is because the induced emf in B depends on the rate of change of flux produced by A. So far so good.

Next, I connected up an iron core transformer and looked at the primary and secondary coils on the scope. This time, both of the traces were in phase.

As far as I can see, the only difference between these two situations is the iron core. I have some vague ideas about what is going on, but then again it's just as likely that I miss read the scope.

Would someone be kind enough to point me in the direction of an explanation of what's going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It could be the (choice of) triggering on the scope, if it's an analogue you can find it triggers on both traces. With two big amplitude traces (Iron core would achieve this), it may be triggering on each one at the same part of the cycle - giving the impression that they are in phase. On an old fashioned scope you can choose either alternate traces or to 'chop' between the traces. That will / should show the true phase relationship.
 
  • Like
Likes MalachiK
Thanks. I thought it might be something like that.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top