Phase invariance of an EM wave in special relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating the phase invariance of an electromagnetic (EM) wave in the context of special relativity. The user attempts to show that the phase of a plane wave, expressed as kx - ωt, remains invariant under Lorentz transformations. The electric field in the lab frame K is given by \(\vec{E}(\vec{x},t) = \hat{z} E_0 \cos{(\frac{k}{\sqrt{2}} (x+y) - \omega t)}\), and the transformed electric field in frame K' is \(\vec{E'}(\vec{x},t) = \hat{z} \gamma (1-\beta) \cos{(\frac{k}{\sqrt{2}} (x+y)-\omega t)}\). The user struggles with the algebraic manipulation required to express the phase in terms of the primed coordinates, specifically regarding the factors of k' and ω'. The correct interpretation of phase invariance is clarified as \(k_\mu x^\mu = k'_\mu x'^\mu\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic wave properties
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of wave equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Learn about phase invariance in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the implications of Maxwell's equations in different inertial frames
  • Investigate the relationship between wave vectors and frequency in special relativity
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, particularly those studying electromagnetism and special relativity, as well as researchers working on wave propagation in relativistic contexts.

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I'm trying to show for a specific, given EM plane wave in vacuum that

kx - \omega t = k' x' - \omega' t'

but I'm running into some difficulties. I'm hoping someone can show me where I'm going wrong. Here's the setup:

In the lab frame K, a plane EM wave traveling in vacuum has an electric field given by

\vec{E}(\vec{x},t) = \hat{z} E0 \cos{(\frac{k}{\sqrt{2}} (x+y) - \omega t)}

where E0, k are positive real constants, omega = ck

Homework Equations



Maxwell's equations
Lorentz transformation

The Attempt at a Solution



First I found the B field in K using Faraday's law. Then I used the standard transformations in Jackson to go from E, B to E', B' in the K' frame.

My electric field in the K' frame is

\vec{E'}(\vec{x},t) =\hat{z} \gamma (1-\beta) \cos{(\frac{k}{\sqrt{2}} (x+y)-\omega t)}

Now I want to use the Lorentz transformation,

x = \gamma (x' + \beta c t') \text{ , } ct = \gamma (c t' + \beta x')

to put E' in terms of the primed coordinates. If I understand Jackson correctly (he says phase of a plane wave is an invariant), then shouldn't we be able to demand that

\frac{k}{\sqrt{2}} (x+y) -\omega t = \frac{k'}{\sqrt{2}} (x'+y') -\omega' t'

?

I'm trying to prove this, doing simple substitution with x, y, t -> x', y', t', but I can't get the factors of k' and w' to come out correctly because of the square root of 2. I'm stuck at:
\frac{k}{\sqrt{2}} (x+y) -\omega t = \gamma \left[k x' (\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}-\beta) + \omega t' (\frac{\beta}{\sqrt{2}}-1) \right] + \frac{y' k}{\sqrt{2}}

I don't know my initial assumption is wrong, or the algebra is just tricky. Any help appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar_4 said:
If I understand Jackson correctly (he says phase of a plane wave is an invariant), then shouldn't we be able to demand that

\frac{k}{\sqrt{2}} (x+y) -\omega t = \frac{k'}{\sqrt{2}} (x'+y') -\omega' t'

?
No, when he says the phase is invariant, he means

k_\mu x^\mu = k'_\mu x'^\mu

where k'^\mu = \Lambda^\mu_\nu k^\nu. Though the x and y components of k are equal in frame K, they generally won't be in K'.
 
Ok, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K