Phase velocity and group velocity

AI Thread Summary
Group velocity represents the speed of a wave packet and cannot exceed the speed of light, aligning with special relativity. In contrast, phase velocity refers to the speed of wave peaks and can exceed light speed, though this does not involve the transmission of energy or information. Examples illustrate that phenomena like a laser spot or shadow can move faster than light without violating relativity, as no physical object is traveling at that speed. The discussion highlights the distinction between classical and quantum mechanics in understanding these velocities. Ultimately, while group velocity is linked to particle velocity, phase velocity remains a theoretical construct without physical implications.
BacalhauGT
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
I Still don't understand why the group velocity has to be less than c but phase velocity not.

Can you explain me this?

Thank you :cry:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The group velocity is the same as the velocity of the particle and can't be higher than the speed of light according to the equations of special relativity.

The phase velocity is the speed of the peaks of the wave and can travel faster than light. The speed of the peaks is more of a mathematical concept; no physical thing is traveling that fast. Since no energy or mass or information is going faster than light, the equations of special relativity are not violated.

It's related to these examples (copied from Wikipedia):
"If a laser is swept across a distant object, the spot of laser light can easily be made to move across the object at a speed greater than c. Similarly, a shadow projected onto a distant object can be made to move across the object faster than c. In neither case does the light travel from the source to the object faster than c, nor does any information travel faster than light."

I recently had a question related to this. The thread is here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=693357
Posts #8 and #9 have derivations of phase and group velocities that you might find helpful.
 
waterfire said:
The group velocity is the same as the velocity of the particle and can't be higher than the speed of light according to the equations of special relativity.

The phase velocity is the speed of the peaks of the wave and can travel faster than light. The speed of the peaks is more of a mathematical concept; no physical thing is traveling that fast. Since no energy or mass or information is going faster than light, the equations of special relativity are not violated.

It's related to these examples (copied from Wikipedia):
"If a laser is swept across a distant object, the spot of laser light can easily be made to move across the object at a speed greater than c. Similarly, a shadow projected onto a distant object can be made to move across the object faster than c. In neither case does the light travel from the source to the object faster than c, nor does any information travel faster than light."

I recently had a question related to this. The thread is here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=693357
Posts #8 and #9 have derivations of phase and group velocities that you might find helpful.


When you say "The group velocity is the same as the velocity of the particle and can't be higher than the speed of light according to the equations of special relativity." you need quantum mechanics, right?
 
BacalhauGT said:
When you say "The group velocity is the same as the velocity of the particle and can't be higher than the speed of light according to the equations of special relativity." you need quantum mechanics, right?

Group velocity is a property of waves. Without quantum mechanics a particle is not considered a wave so there is no group velocity or phase velocity, only the velocity of the particle.

You can say that the velocity of the particle can't be higher than the speed of light without quantum mechanics, but then there is no group velocity.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top