Phasor Calculation: Solve -43.62+j20.52

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve13579
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phasor
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the phasor notation for -43.62+j20.52, the angle must be adjusted by adding 180 degrees due to its position in the second or third quadrant. The initial calculation using arctan gives -25.19 degrees, but the correct angle is 154.8 degrees after this adjustment. In another example, dividing -2∠0° by 0.45-j0.15 led to confusion, as the initial approach suggested a result of -4.22∠18.435°, which is incorrect. The proper method involves recognizing that -2∠0° is equivalent to 2∠180°, leading to the correct answer of 4.22∠-161.75°. Understanding the quadrant and magnitude is crucial for accurate phasor calculations.
Steve13579
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the phasor notation for -43.62+j20.52
My answer is 180 degrees off and I don't know why you add it in this case. I just want to know how to calculate angle, the magnitude I found fine.

Homework Equations


tan-1(X/R)

The Attempt at a Solution


tan-1(20.52/-43.62) = -25.19 degrees
That's the answer I get but the answer is 180 degrees plus my result above resulting in 154.8 degrees

edit: I'm guessing it may be because it's in quadrant 2 or 3?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you will draw a simple sketch of your phasor, the answer should appear immediately.

Remember, doing a simple arctan calculation on a calculator returns only the principal angle θ such that -π/2 ≤ θ ≤ π/2. You must examine the components of a particular phasor to determine the proper quadrant.
 
Got it, makes sense! It helped to think of the limitations of my calculator computing arctan with only one value input rather than two if that makes sense...

If you wouldn't mind I came across something that is probably a similar situation.
I have -2∠0°/(0.45-j0.15) which I turned into -2∠0°/0.474∠-18.435° and solved resulting in: -4.22∠18.435°
But apparently you can not do that... the answer is 4.22∠-161.75°
I can get that answer too by writing the polar notation of -2∠0° as -2 and than dividing by 0.45-j0.15. Can I not solve the way I initially tried because of a phase angle of 0? It has no reluctance and only a real resistance of -2, well not really a negative resistance but ya. Is that the reason I can not try what I did? Thanks!
 
Steve13579 said:
Got it, makes sense! It helped to think of the limitations of my calculator computing arctan with only one value input rather than two if that makes sense...

If you wouldn't mind I came across something that is probably a similar situation.
I have -2∠0°/(0.45-j0.15) which I turned into -2∠0°/0.474∠-18.435° and solved resulting in: -4.22∠18.435°
But apparently you can not do that... the answer is 4.22∠-161.75°
I can get that answer too by writing the polar notation of -2∠0° as -2 and than dividing by 0.45-j0.15. Can I not solve the way I initially tried because of a phase angle of 0? It has no reluctance and only a real resistance of -2, well not really a negative resistance but ya. Is that the reason I can not try what I did? Thanks!

Remember, -2∠0° = 2∠180°

You always want the first number in phasor notation to represent the magnitude of the phasor, hence it is always positive.

Your division problem would then be

(2/0.474)∠(180°-(-18.435°)) = 4.22∠198.435° = 4.22∠-161.55°
 
I forgot about that.. Thanks so much!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top