- 15,741
- 8,937
I agree, however for the answer 1/16 to be correct, not some but exactly 1/4 of the light that makes it through the lens falls on the photosensitive area. The way I see it, the answer of 1/16 is obtained using the following reasoningDrakkith said:It wouldn't be true if the image of the light source becomes larger than the cathode so that some of the light no longer falls on the photosensitive area and is lost.
1. The larger lens is one focal length away from the photosensitive area.
2. With the larger lens in place, the Sun's image covers exactly the photosensitive area and there is no photosensitive material outside this area.
3. The smaller lens will gather only 1/4 of the photons that the larger lens gathered.
4. The smaller lens replaces the larger lens at the same distance from the photosensitive area.
5. The diameter of the image at the distance to the photosensitive area will double and the area of the image at that distance will quadruple.
6. Since the photosensitive area remains the same, but the area of the Sun's image is quadrupled, only 1/4 of the photons that make it through the smaller lens produce current, the overall factor being 1/4×1/4 = 1/16.
As @Drakkith pointed out, the choice of ##(1/4)I## is correct if one believes that a tacit assumption to the question is that all the photons that pass through either lens hit the photosensitive area.
The choice of ##(1/16)I## is correct if one believes that a tacit assumption to the question is statement 2 above.
Take your pick.