Photoelectric effect - experimental

MarkovMarakov
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Photoelectric effect -- experimental

Homework Statement


Suppose you are doing an experiment to determine the work function of a metal.*
You get k.e.$_1$, $\nu_1$ and k.e.$_2, \nu_2$.
*
We know that k.e.= $h\nu - W$ but when you solve the simultaneous equations, we have a $h$ slightly different from the textbook value.

Question: In such a situation should you

a) Use the textbook $h$ then average {$W_1,W_2$}; or

b) Simply solve the simultaneous equations for $W$

I believe that the values obtained will be different. And no further experiments are done.

Thank you.


Homework Equations


see above.


The Attempt at a Solution


The 2 proposed methods of determining W
 
Physics news on Phys.org
will produce different values. The more accurate method would be to solve the simultaneous equations for W. This is because the textbook h is not necessarily the exact value of h you should use in the experiment. By solving the simultaneous equations, you are using the exact value of h that is found in the experiment. Therefore, it is recommended to solve the simultaneous equations for W.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top