Photoelectric effect, retarding potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for the work function of a material using the photoelectric effect and retarding potential. A retarding potential of 0.92 volts is applied to monochromatic radiation with a wavelength of 2500 Å. The relevant equation is eØ = hc/λ - W, where hc is given as 1240 eV·nm. After converting the wavelength to meters, the work function is calculated to be 4.04 eV. The solution effectively demonstrates how to apply the photoelectric effect principles to determine the work function.
howin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Photoelectric effect, retarding potential

Homework Statement



If the photocurrent of a photocell is cut off by a retarding potential of 0.92 volts for monochromatic radiation of 2500 A (A with the little circle above it), what is the work function of the material.

Homework Equations



My book and professor use different symbols so I am going to define the symbols I am using:
Ø means retarding potential / stopping potential
W means work function

e Ø = hc/lambda - W

hc = 1240 eV

The Attempt at a Solution



radiance is invariant with lambda b/c monochromatic
According to the graph of photocurrent i vs. anode voltage V, it is when V = -Ø that i goes to 0. I don't see where 2500A fits in, except that that must give me lambda so that I can solve for W in the equation above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got everything you need. Just plug them all into your equation and solve for W!
 
2500 \AA is the wavelength.

1 \AA = 10^{-10}m
 
Wow, that helps a lot!

Oh okay, having A be a measure of length helps a lot...I was an econ/poli sci major so missed a lot of this stuff undergrad = )

2500A = 2.5 * 10^-7m = 250 nm

So W = (1240 eV nm / 250 nm) - .92 eV = 4.04 eV which is the work function.

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top