Photon & Antimatter: Annihilation & Neutron Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haibara Ai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter Photons
Haibara Ai
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
If photons are their own antimatter, then why don't they just annihilate? Also, do neutrons have antimatter, or is it themselves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The very requirement for antiparticle is not that they annihilate.
Antiparticles is just the opposite charge and spin (time reversed particle), and SOME antiparticles will annihilate if they interact with each other. Now in standard QED, photon-photon interactions is not possible (at least not with a virtual photon coupling, but with several virtual electron/positrons)
see http://universe-review.ca/R15-12-QFT.htm

So in one sense two photons will annihilate and form photons again ;-)

I mean, what is meant by annihilation in physics anyway?

The antiparticle of the neutron is the antineutron, which has the constituent anti-quarks of the neutron, eg. 2 anti-down, 1 anti-up
 
That makes sense...
Thanks!
 

Thread 'Toponium Discovered'

Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
View full post »

Thread 'Dirac-Delta from Normalization of Continuous Eigenfunctions'

I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Matter & Antimatter: Attraction & Annihilation Evidence?
Replies
6
Views
3K
I Need a layman's explanation for how scientists contain antimatter
Replies
21
Views
3K
I Could the primeval antimatter "be among us"?
Replies
3
Views
1K
A Why don't we see super-symmetric particles?
Replies
6
Views
2K
A Pair production without nucleus
Replies
13
Views
3K
I Matter/antimatter collisons between "unlike" particles?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Matter-antimatter annihilation and inflation
Replies
2
Views
2K
B What happens when gamma rays with ultra-high energies interact with matter?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Matter/antimatter hybrid atomic structures?
Replies
21
Views
4K
I T2K sees ~3 sigma evidence for neutrino CP violation
Replies
23
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top