Unveiling the Mysteries of Photon Helicity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Usaf Moji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helicity Photon
Usaf Moji
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
I'm perplexed about something that Wikipedia says about photon helicity:

The magnitude of its spin is \sqrt{2} \hbar and the component measured along its direction of motion, its helicity, must be \pm\hbar.

(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon)

But for a photon, doesn't the spin vector always point in the same direction as the momentum vector - and therefore, shouldn't the magnitude of a photon's helicity equal it's spin magnitude, i.e. \sqrt{2} \hbar?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spin vector is always at an angle to the propagation vector, such that its component in the direction of propagation is \pm \hbar and its magnitude is \sqrt{s(s+1)}\hbar = \sqrt{2}\hbar.

In theory, one might expect that the photon could also have a spin projection of zero. However, apparently this would require that the photon have non-zero rest mass (which it doesn't), so a zero helicity state is not observed.

If somebody can explain why a zero spin projection is ruled out by relativity in more detail, I would be grateful.
 
Last edited:
Usaf Moji: WHY must the spin of the photon be aligned in the same direction as its momentum-vector?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top