Photon Mass and Momentum: Train Experiment

lntz
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a question that i'd like to ask, but the wording is a little tricky, so I hope you can get the gist of what I'm trying to describe.

I was thinking about the thought experiment that is often used to describe relative motion - a light clock on a train passing through a station being observed from the platform. From there I had an idea that isn't directly related, but it came out of the train.

Imagine you have a train traveling along a straight piece of track and on board there is a photon emitter aiming perpendicular to the direction of travel. (This is where I don't think I explain it too well). Before the photons have been emitted, can they be said to exist? I ask this because I'm wondering whether they already have momentum in direction the train is traveling in when they are emitted. So, would an emitted photon leave the train perpendicular to the direction of travel, or at some angle caused by a component in the direction of trains motion?

I hope that makes sense and that this is in the correct part of the forum,

Thanks in advance,

Lntz.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lntz said:
So, would an emitted photon leave the train perpendicular to the direction of travel, or at some angle caused by a component in the direction of trains motion?
According to train observers, the path of the photon is perpendicular to the direction of the train's travel. But according to platform observers, the path is at an angle.
 
Thanks for the reply.

I should have thought this one through! I really should have realized the path would be different for the two observers...
 
lntz said:
I really should have realized the path would be different for the two observers...
Right. The speed of light is invariant, but not the velocity (direction).
 
Before the photons have been emitted, can they be said to exist?

That depends on the nature of your source, not on it's relative motion. Suppose you have a light bulb 'on' in a closed box and you transmit by opening a door in the box. Then suppose you keep the light turned 'off' until you wish to transmit.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top