Phrasing 3rd order ODE as a first order problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sonique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    First order Ode
Sonique
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi,

Wondering if anyone can give me some help with reducing this 3rd order ODE to a first order problem, so it can be written in the form u' = f(u, t)

Homework Equations



The 3rd order ODE is: x'''(t) + x''(t) + 2x'(t) + 2x(t) = 2t^2 + 4t - 5;
The initial values x(0) = -3; x'(0) = 2; x''(0) = 2 are given

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried defining new variables u1 = x, u2 = x', u3 = x'' then u = (u1 u2 u3) and u' = (x' x'' x''') which gives the right order of x, but I'm unsure of how to phrase this in a way that's equivalent to the ODE with the right coefficients
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need three equations for u's. The first one: u1' = u2. Can you see why? Can you find the other two?
 
I can see that you can u1, u2 and u3 such that u1' = u2, u2' = u3, u1'' = u3 and u3' will give x''', but I'm not sure how you get it into the form in the question where there is a single u. I was thinking you needed to put the individual u's as a vector like u = (u1 u2 u3) and u' = (u1' u2' u3') = (u2 u3 u3'). Is this right?
 
That's precisely correct. You have the vector on the left hand side, u', and you have the vector on the right side. The composition of the left-hand side vector is simply (u1', u2', u3'), and you already know two thirds of the right hand side vector: (u2, u3, ?).

What is '?' Remember, it must be a function of u and t, but not of u'. This is where you should use the original equation.
 
So do you substitute in the u's into the original question to find ?, so that x''' = 2t^2 + 4t -5 - u3 - u2 - u1 which gives a function of u and t??
 
Exactly!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top