Physical properties & threshold frequency

SmileyMan
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
What effects do the physical properties (size of atom etc.) of an elemental metal have on the threshold frequency for that metal? I haven't been able to find a correlation between a physical property and the size of the threshold frequency myself; maybe I haven't looked hard enough, or maybe I've misunderstood something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By "threshold frequency" do you mean "work function" as in photoelectric effect? In that case, it's the ionization energy/electron affinity/all that stuff based on the "physical property" of charge shielding etc.
 
Einstein Mcfly said:
By "threshold frequency" do you mean "work function" as in photoelectric effect? In that case, it's the ionization energy/electron affinity/all that stuff based on the "physical property" of charge shielding etc.

Thank you for answering. Yes, that is what I mean. Do you know where I can find an article describing how those properties affect the work function? I am finishing a project on quantum mechanics, and this is the only part I need.
 
Well, like I said, it's got a lot to do with the ionization energy and/or electron affinity of the metal. If you think about what you learned in your chemistry classes, ionization energy is the amount of energy needed to remove an electron from the highest occupied orbital. In the photoelectric effect experiment, you're striking a metal with a photon (of a certain energy) and removing its electron. So, if you look up these three things (I'd say start with wikipedia) it should start to make sense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_function
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_affinity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionization_energy
 
This is a backwards question.
The physical properties of the material are due to the bonding properties and so forth of the constituent atoms, which in turn is a quantum-mechanical property. The work function is also a quantum mechanical property and related to the bonding etc, but apart from that observation there's no simple relationship between these things.
 
Okay. Thank you both for answering. You have given me something to think about.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top