I Physical significance of nodes?

Sheldon Cooper
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi,

II have an issue with nodes in QM, like suppose in a well, the number of nodes depend on (n-1), the thing is that, what is so special(physically) about the point that the particle cannot be located there?

Thanks is advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sheldon Cooper said:
the thing is that, what is so special(physically) about the point that the particle cannot be located there?
Nothing is special about those points. You can make any point be a node or not be a node just by changing the energy of the particle, which tells us that it's the energy that matters and not some properties of the points in space where the nodes happen to be.

An analogy from classical physics: A planet will pass through some points in space and not others as it moves around the sun. That doesn't make the points along the orbit special; the planet is just going where Newton's laws say it will go and not going anywhere else.
 
Nugatory said:
Nothing is special about those points. You can make any point be a node or not be a node just by changing the energy of the particle, which tells us that it's the energy that matters and not some properties of the points in space where the nodes happen to be.

An analogy from classical physics: A planet will pass through some points in space and not others as it moves around the sun. That doesn't make the points along the orbit special; the planet is just going where Newton's laws say it will go and not going anywhere else.

While I do agree that nodes aren't special, I think you're mistaken about the energy bit, you can always refine a Hamilton by adding cI where I is unity and c is a real constant, this will change all observable energies by c but will not alter the eigenbasis, that is energy is not unique, basis are
 
nashed said:
While I do agree that nodes aren't special, I think you're mistaken about the energy bit, you can always refine a Hamilton by adding cI where I is unity and c is a real constant, this will change all observable energies by c but will not alter the eigenbasis, that is energy is not unique, basis are
Yes, that's right... I could have said ##p^2## to be more accurate.
 
Perfect cancellation of right moving and left moving waves.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top