Physics 11 Significant Figures Doubts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct application of significant figures in calculations. When multiplying 65 m/s by 3.2 s, the result should be expressed as 210 m, which is 2 significant figures, due to both original numbers having 2 significant figures. The conversion of 208 m to scientific notation as 2.1 x 10^2 m is also valid but unnecessary for this context. The number 210 has 2 significant figures unless specifically noted with a decimal point, which would indicate 3 significant figures. It's clarified that significant figures should be determined based on the values provided in the problem, not solely on the question's context.
studenta
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1) Which is right?

65m/s x 3.2 s = 208 m

or

65m/s x 3.2 s = 2.1 x 10^1 m2) is 210 - 3 s.f. or 2 s.f. ?
3) my teacher uses the question as a guide for s.f., is that correct?

e.g. A projectile is fired with an initial speed of 1.12 s at a height of 34 m .

( after few calculation steps)

d = 7.32 m/s x 2.18 s
= 15.96m
= 16 m ( because 34 m in the question is 2 s.f.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
208 m → 2.1 × 102 m
 
SammyS said:
208 m → 2.1 × 102 m

SO 2.1 × 10^2 m is the correct answer instead of 208 m? right?
 
65m/s x 3.2 s = 208 m

This is not correct. When you multiply significant digits, you use the number of significant digits from the term with the least. If 65 has 2 SD, and 3.2 also has 2 SD, then your answer should be 2 as well. You simply need to take that 208 to 2 SD, by rounding the 8 up to the next decimal place (it is > 5 afterall).

For this one:
65m/s x 3.2 s = 2.1 x 10^2 m (square it)
This is actually correct, but I don't know why you wouldn't just say 210

2) is 210 - 3 s.f. or 2 s.f. ?

It looks like your problem is in determining placeholder digits and such. 210 is 2 significant figures, but "210." is 3 significant digits (note the decimal place).
 
Thanks.
What about the 3rd questions? Should we determine sig.figs according to questions?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top