Physics: Box sliding down an inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 10kg mass on a frictionless inclined plane and a 20kg mass hanging via a pulley. The key point is the calculation of acceleration and the choice of using the component of weight along the incline, specifically 56N, instead of 80N. The reasoning is that only the component of the gravitational force acting parallel to the incline contributes to the block's acceleration. The discussion emphasizes the importance of visualizing the setup, as the direction of forces and their components significantly affect the equations used. Ultimately, the problem is clarified through understanding the forces acting on the blocks and their respective directions.
undertow2005
i'm trying to learn this stuff on my own so please bear with me.
here's the problem:

you have two mass, a 10kg on a frictionless 35 degree inclined plane, which is attached to 20kg mass via a pulley cord to hang vertically. Whats the aceleration?

Solution:

for the box hanging freely they got this equation, 196N-T=20kg*acclerertion----i understand this

To get the equation for the box on the plane they did this:
98Nsin35=56N
98cos35=80N

out of these two results, 56n and 80N, they choose 56N to get the equation for the box which is T-56N=10kg*a
my question is why they they choose to use 56N and not 80N which would have resulted in the equation T-80N=10*a

continuing the solution the book has, they combined the two equations, 196N-T=20kg*a and T-56N=10kg*a to get this:
140N30kg*a
a=4.7 m/s/s I understand this part also.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"To get the equation for the box on the plane they did this:
98Nsin35=56N
98cos35=80N

out of these two results, 56n and 80N, they choose 56N to get the equation for the box which is T-56N=10kg*a
my question is why they they choose to use 56N and not 80N which would have resulted in the equation T-80N=10*a"

The tangent vector along the inclined plane has the form:
\vec{T}=\cos35\vec{i}+\sin35\vec{j}

(Agreed?)

Clearly, the weight of the block on the plane works in the vertical direction,
that is:
\vec{W}=-Mg\vec{j}
where M is the mass of the block.

Now, clearly, only the component of the weight along the plane (i.e parallell to the plane) contributes to the block's acceleration.
The component of the weight along the plane normal (90 degrees on the plane) is offset by a normal force from the ground.

Try to establish the component of the weight along the inclined plane!
 
I'm a little stumped as well. There's always a couple different points of view you can use to set these up, with one usually being easier to visualize than the others. A picture is worth a thousand words in a lot of cases, this being a good example. If the reader doesn't visualize the position of the pulley correctly, there is no way to solve the problem.

If you cut the rope between the 10kg block and the pulley, there is only one force acting on the block - the force of gravity (9.8 m/sec^2) times the mass of the block to give you a 98 N force acting on the block with the direction of the force being straight down. The 10kg block can only move one direction - down the inclined plane.

If you set the block's only possible direction of motion as the principal direction, the force is at a 55 degree angle to the only possible direction of movement. Multiplying the force times the cosine of 55 degrees (which happens to equal the sine of 35 degrees) provides the component of the force along the block's direction of movement. The force times the sine of 55 degrees gives you how much force is directed perpendicular to the plane's inclined surface and, being perpendicualr, it contributes nothing to the object's motion down the inclined plane. So, you could say the block is accelerating down the inclined plane at 3.5 meters/second^2.

Since the author used the sine of 35 degrees as the force directed down the inclined surface of the plane, he obviously took a different point of view. Doesn't matter, sometimes the easiest point of view to take is a subjective matter.

If you don't cut the rope, you have another force acting on the object. Without a picture, there's no way to know what direction that force is coming from.

If the pulley is directly above the 10kg block, there is a 196N force straight up - directly opposite the force of gravity and there's no need to worry about the sine or cosine. So, I'm assuming this isn't the way the picture is drawn in the book (unless the author of the problem became a little confused).

If the pulley is at the high end of the ramp, positioned so the rope runs along the inclined surface to the 10kg block, whatever force results from the 20kg block is directed parallel to the surface of the inclined plane from the bottom of the plane towards the top. Then the equations the problem used make sense. There is a 196N force pulling from the low end of the incline to the high end directly opposite the 56N force accelerating the 10kg block down the ramp.
 
thanks alot, i understand it now
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top