Physics electric kettle experiments?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics assignment focused on electric kettles, requiring the identification, research, and experimental validation of their physical principles. Participants suggest conducting experiments to analyze the kettle's efficiency and potential design improvements. One humorous suggestion includes simply filling the kettle with water and turning it on to observe basic functionality. The thread emphasizes the need for creativity in designing experiments that demonstrate quantifiable physics concepts related to electric kettles. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of practical experimentation in understanding the physics of everyday appliances.
MehhShell
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Physics "electric kettle" experiments?

Alrighty all you geniuses. I have a physics assignment that I need to actually start, I've been away from school for the past 2 weeks so I haven't really heard much about what is actually required; but going by my task sheet

"Your task is to identify, research and then validate by experiment the quantifiable physics of an electric kettle. You must design, plan and perform a series of experiments that verify what you have identified and demonstrate the physical principles involved. You should also analyse the efficiency of the kettle and identify possible improvements in the design of your chosen electric kettle."

I have little to no ideas of what I could experiment on, as I have said, I've been away a fair amount and haven't even learned much on the whole concept.

Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MehhShell! :smile:
MehhShell said:
"Your task is to identify, research and then validate by experiment the quantifiable physics of an electric kettle. You must design, plan and perform a series of experiments that verify what you have identified and demonstrate the physical principles involved. You should also analyse the efficiency of the kettle and identify possible improvements in the design of your chosen electric kettle."

I have little to no ideas of what I could experiment on,

Have you tried filling it with water, and turning it on? o:)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top