Physics Help: Solve a Sliding Child Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter roxxyroxx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Sliding
AI Thread Summary
A child with mass m slides down a 4.0 m high slide, reaching a speed of 3.5 m/s at the bottom. To determine the percentage of gravitational potential energy (GPE) that hasn't been converted to kinetic energy (KE), one must calculate both GPE at the top and KE at the bottom. The equations for KE and GPE are used to find their respective values, with the difference indicating energy lost. The formula for calculating the percentage of untransformed GPE involves subtracting KE from GPE, dividing by total GPE, and multiplying by 100. This approach effectively quantifies the energy transformation during the slide.
roxxyroxx
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Physics help?

Homework Statement



a child with a mass m slides down a 4.0 m high slide. starting from rest, the child has a speed of 3.5 m/s at the bottom of the slide. what percent of the gravitational potential energy of the child at the top of the slide hasn't been transformed into kinetic energy once the child reaches the bottom?

Homework Equations



Ee = 0.5kx^2
Ek = 0.5mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



idk where 2 start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Since the child is at a distance above the ground, you should use gravitational potential energy instead of Ee (Elastic potential energy)

Find the kinetic energy of the child at the bottom and then find the gravitational pe at the top of the slide.
 


rock.freak667 said:
Since the child is at a distance above the ground, you should use gravitational potential energy instead of Ee (Elastic potential energy)

Find the kinetic energy of the child at the bottom and then find the gravitational pe at the top of the slide.

Ek = 6.1(mass)
Ep = 39.2 (mass)
now...
 


roxxyroxx said:
Ek = 6.1(mass)
Ep = 39.2 (mass)
now...

I didnt check the numbers, I am assuming they are right. So you have the potential energy, and the final kinetic energy. You want to find what percent of the gravitational potential energy of the child at the top of the slide hasn't been transformed into kinetic energy once the child reaches the bottom. So you can see that there was just more potential energy than kinetic energy, so there is a difference there.

So to find the % of Gpe that hasnt been transformed just subtract the 2 to get the amount of energy lost. To find the % of Gpe that wasnt transformed just divide (The difference of PE and KE/ Total GPE) x 100
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top