Physics homework on Radioactivity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving the decay of a radioactive material emitting two particles with different half-lives. The key question is determining the time after which one-fourth of the material remains when only considering the half-life t2. Participants explore the relationship between the mean life of the sample and the half-lives, using formulas for decay rates and activities. Despite attempts to solve the problem, discrepancies arise in the calculated value for t2, with one participant suggesting it should be 810 years, while their method yields 487 years. The conversation highlights the complexity of decay calculations involving multiple half-lives and the importance of verifying methods.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A radioactive material decays by simultaneous emission of two particles with respective half-lives t1 and t2. If the material decays by the emission of the particle with half-life t2 only, then the time in year after which 1/4 th of the material remains is. (Given t1=1620 years and mean-life T of the sample = 540 years)

The Attempt at a Solution



None.

Is there any relation between the mean life of the sample T and half-lives t1 and t2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes there is:

t_{average} = \frac{1}{\lambda}

t_{half life} = \frac{0.693}{\lambda}

so you can find the relation
 


That is the relation for one decay alone. Here we have two half lives t1 and t2 of two decays.
 


You can find it like this:

activity of first rxn = A1
activity of second rxn = A2

so net activity, A = A1 + A2
(pretty obvious as activity is measure of decay and net decay is just sum of 2 decays)

λN = λ1N + λ2N

solve and substitute for λ, λ1, λ2 in terms of T, t1, t2
 


We don't get the correct answer that way. Backsolving from the correct answer, t2 should be 810 years. But using your method it comes out to be 487 years.
 


i guess the method is correct because i have used it in many questions and it gives a correct answer
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top