Physics Magnetism - Wire Carrying Current in a Loop

KSNphysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is a theoretical question, one I'm not sure about. It just randomly popped into my head.
Say there is a jumbled wire, one in a glob shape but not overlapping. (Like a deformed circle, or maybe just a rectangle).
Assuming we are in a place called "physics utopia" where the wire is closed and a continuous current circles through it, would the said rectangle or "glob" eventually become a circle due to the outward force caused by the magnetic field and current.?
I did the corkscrew rule and right hand rule, and in a rectangle/glob, the force on all points of the wire points outward, so just wondering if a circle would eventually be formed.

Homework Equations


Corkscrew rule to find the direction of magnetic field
Right hand rule to find direction of force using known current and magnetic field (I found it was outwards basically everywhere).

The Attempt at a Solution


Stated above
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So there is not an unbalanced charge on the loop - but there is a current in the loop ... you are thinking that places in the loop which carry opposite currents will exert a repulsive force on each other so they must add up to a net outward pressure?
That seems reasonable... have you had a look at how other people have answered the same question?

http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...g-wire-of-arbitrary-shape-in-a-magnetic-field
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/2uto4s/does_a_rectangular_loop_of_current_exert_a/
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top