Physics of Car Driving on Banked Curve: Forces at Play

  • Thread starter Thread starter Melac12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Forces
AI Thread Summary
When a car drives on a banked curve, the normal force increases due to the car's interaction with the ground, balancing the gravitational force at a specific speed. The discussion highlights that while the normal force counteracts gravity's vertical component, the parallel component of gravity still exists and contributes to the car's acceleration. At perfect speed, the forces align to maintain balance, but deviations in speed lead to frictional forces acting either up or down the slope. The parallel component of gravity is crucial for understanding centripetal acceleration, as it creates an unbalanced force when not perfectly aligned. This interaction explains the dynamics of driving on banked curves effectively.
Melac12
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
When a car drives on a banked curve it pushes into the ground and the ground pushes back making its normal force bigger then it would be just form the perpendicular component (to the road) of gravity. And at a perfect speed, the normal force’s up component balances the gravity. My first question is what about the component of gravity parallel to the road. I know that we don’t use a tilted coordinate system but that component of gravity has to do something, and since in other cases when the speed is not perfect the force of friction either acts up or down parallel to the road. Clearly the force of friction is not affected by gravity in any way. So what happens to the parallel part of gravity, or at least why is it not an issue?
http://batesvilleinschools.com/physics/PhyNet/Mechanics/Circular%20Motion/banked_with_friction.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Melac12 said:
at a perfect speed, the normal force’s up component balances the gravity.
Quite so, but the perpendicular direction to that is horizontal, not parallel to the road surface.
In the parallel to road direction, you have a component of gravity and no normal force, so there is an acceleration. This will be the component of the centripetal acceleration in that direction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top