Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around whether individuals with a PhD in physics can teach engineering courses at a university level, particularly in the context of engineering physics degrees. Participants explore the qualifications needed and the circumstances under which a physics PhD might be suitable for teaching engineering subjects.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants propose that a PhD in physics may allow one to teach engineering courses, but this is contingent on specific expertise and the nature of the course.
- Others argue that the question is vague and that teaching opportunities depend on narrow and specific cases, such as the overlap between physics and engineering fields like accelerator science.
- A participant mentions that engineering physics degrees combine physics and engineering courses, raising the question of whether physics faculty could teach engineering courses if they have relevant expertise.
- Another participant shares their experience of having courses taught by individuals with physics PhDs, suggesting that such arrangements can occur when the instructor's specialty aligns with the course content.
- One participant discusses the influence of demand for lecturers and departmental politics on who gets to teach, indicating that flexibility and the popularity of the course can affect opportunities for teaching outside one's primary area of expertise.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the qualifications necessary for teaching engineering courses with a physics PhD. There is no consensus on whether a physics PhD is sufficient or under what conditions it might be applicable.
Contextual Notes
The discussion highlights the complexity of academic hiring practices and the variability of departmental policies regarding course assignments, which may depend on institutional context and specific course demands.