Physics position problem (Block on a flatbed)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexis2020
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Position
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a flatbed truck supported by a notch and tires, with a weight limit of 1500N and the flatbed itself weighing 1200N. Participants express confusion over the problem's description and the clarity of the accompanying diagram. They emphasize the need for a clear free body diagram to illustrate all forces acting on the flatbed, particularly the 1200N weight and the support forces. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the distribution of forces to determine how close a 1400N block can be placed to the notch without exceeding the weight limit. A clear diagram and proper identification of forces are deemed essential for solving the problem accurately.
Alexis2020
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
static equilibrium?
Relevant Equations
I am not to clear on the direction
Homework Statement:
a flat bed being attached to a notch, the limit on the notch was 1500N, the flat bed was 1200N . The length of the flat bed is 14 m, at 12 m are the tires. How close can you put a 1400N block to the notch before it surpasses the weight limit?
Homework Equations:
I tired 1400N/1200N then Multiply by 12, but seems to miss the actual purpose of the problem
 

Attachments

  • TT.jpeg
    TT.jpeg
    42 KB · Views: 239
Physics news on Phys.org
The description is most unclear, and the thumbnail sketch in the image barely legible. Was a diagram provided?
At a guess, the flatbed is supported in a horizontal position by the notch at one end and one axle through a pair of tyres at distance 12m from the notch. The flatbed continues 2m beyond the tyres. Is that correct?
 
haruspex said:
The description is most unclear, and the thumbnail sketch in the image barely legible. Was a diagram provided?
At a guess, the flatbed is supported in a horizontal position by the notch at one end and one pair of tyres at distance 12m from the notch. The flatbed continues 2m beyond the tyres. Is that correct?
yes.
 
Alexis2020 said:
yes.
Then draw and post a large, clear free body diagram of the flatbed, showing all the forces on it.
 
?hash=0c9ffe82bc6fc7bb18dbf5c76735a442.jpg
 

Attachments

  • po.jpeg
    po.jpeg
    38.4 KB · Views: 229
Alexis2020 said:
A few issues there.
The 1200N is the weight of the flatbed. Which way does that force act on it?
We don't care about the forces on the tires (is that what the mg is?)
You are missing two other forces on the flatbed. What is holding it up?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top