Physics problem, involving Hookes Law?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a mass and a spring, specifically applying Hooke's Law to determine how far the spring was compressed. The key equations used are the elastic potential energy (Ep) and kinetic energy (Ek) formulas. Participants debate the correct application of energy conservation principles, noting that at the equilibrium point (x=0), the potential energy is zero and only kinetic energy remains. One user arrives at a compression value of 0.358 m, suggesting possible discrepancies in the textbook answer or unaccounted friction. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying energy conservation to solve for the spring's compression accurately.
x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


A 0.500 kg mass is resting to a horizontal spring constant of 45 N/m. Your lab partner pulls the spring back and releases it when you are not looking. When the spring reaches its equilibrium point (x=0) the velocity of the mass is 3.4 m/s.

Find how far your partner compressed the spring.


Homework Equations


Ep = 1/2 k x ^2
k = spring constant
Ek = 1/2 m v ^2



The Attempt at a Solution


Not really sure how to do this, since there is more than one unknown.

Ep1 = Ep2 + Ek2

They never stated the spring stops at x=0, and I'm willing to bet it doesn't. However, when I assume that Ep1 = Ek2 and assume it stops, I get 0.30 m (rounded) when the answer should be 0.19m

Am I doing this right if I just set Ep1 to Ek2? It doesn't make sense to do it like this, because it should be

Ep1 = Ep2 + Ek2

But then we don't have enough info to solve the equation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the elastic potential energy at the equilibrium point (x=0)?
Check the first sentence of your post. Something is missing. ehild
 
what you're really saying is that at x=0 the total energy of the system is just the KE because the spring is at its equilibrium position and hence there's zero PE and initially there's no KE and since energy is conserved.

PE1 + KE1 = PE2 + KE2 where KE1=0 and PE2=0 so PE1 = KE2 seems right.

I calculated the compression to be 0.358 m so I'm thinking maybe the book answer is wrong or there's some assumed friction component.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top