What is the speed of the second stage after separation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MightyMan11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Rocket
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of the second stage of a two-stage rocket after separation, using the conservation of momentum principle. The initial speed of the rocket is 1192.0 m/s, and the first stage, which is twice as massive as the second stage, is pushed backward at 32.4 m/s relative to the second stage. After correcting an initial misunderstanding about relative speeds, it is clarified that the first stage continues to move upward but at a reduced speed. The final calculation for the second stage's speed results in approximately 1181 m/s after accounting for the momentum conservation. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding relative motion in such problems.
MightyMan11
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A two-stage rocket is traveling at 1192.0 m/s with respect to the Earth when the first stage runs out of fuel. Explosive bolts release the first stage and push it backward with a speed of 32.4 m/s relative to the second stage. The first stage is 2.00 times as massive as the second stage. What is the speed of the second stage after the separation?

Homework Equations


Conversation of momentum.

The Attempt at a Solution


I first set the second stage's mass as "m". The mass of the first stage then would be "2m" and the total rocket would have a mass of "3m".
Using the conservation of momentum I made an equation:
momentum of first stage+momentum of second stage= momentum of the rocket
(-32.4)*(2m) + v(m) = 1192(3m)

the m's cancel out and I solved for v:
3,640.8 m/s

however this does not match the answer in my textbook... :/

Thanks in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
push it backward with a speed of 32.4 m/s relative to the second stage.
Note the word "relative". It is highly significant!
 
Wow,
I didn't catch that...
Does that mean then the first stage of the rocket is still moving up, just at a slower speed than the second stage? (1192-32.4=speed of first stage)?
And since the first stage is "slowing down", if momentum is conserved the second stage should "speed up"?
 
It means that, if v1 is the fist stage's velocity, v2 the secondstage,
then we have the equation:
v_{1}-v_{2}=-34m/s\to{v}_{1}=v_{2}-34m/s
Thus, energy conservation becomes:
(2m)(v_{2}-34)+mv_{2}=(3m)1192
Solving for v2, we get:
3mv_{2}=m(3*1192+2*34),
which you can manage on your own.
And yes, the other stage will still be moving upwards, at approximately 1181m/s
 
Ah.
Thank you very much for your help.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top