Physics Superposition and Standing Waves (ch. 18)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the frequency of a vibrating string to form a standing wave pattern. Participants initially used the formula f=(n/2L)*sqrt(T/µ) but varied in their interpretations of the length L and the harmonic number n. The correct tension was confirmed to be approximately 41.3 N, and the consensus for the frequency converged around 152 Hz after clarifying the effective length of the wave segment. Misunderstandings regarding the length of the string and the harmonic number led to different frequency calculations, but ultimately, the correct approach involved using the effective length of 2.0 m for the wave segment. The final agreement on the frequency was around 152 Hz, highlighting the importance of accurately defining parameters in wave calculations.
Keithkent09
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 6.70 kg object hangs in equilibrium from a string with a total length of L = 5.30 m and a linear mass density of µ = 0.00100 kg/m. The string is wrapped around two light frictionless pulleys that are separated by a distance of d = 2.00 m. (visual is attached) The tension is 41.6 N
At what frequency must the string between the pulleys vibrate in order to form the standing wave pattern shown in (b)? (Visual is attached)

Homework Equations


f=(n/2L)*sqrt(T/u)


The Attempt at a Solution


I already figured out the tension so I plugged in the relevant values and what I thought the value for n might be but nothing I tried worked.
 

Attachments

  • p14-59.gif
    p14-59.gif
    2.7 KB · Views: 514
Physics news on Phys.org
I get around 150 Hz, is this what you got?
 
The correct answer is 155 and I got 150 one of the times I worked the problem. What did you use for n?
 
I used n=3 from the photo. I assume your tension computation was correct. You may want to dbl check to see if it is off a bit.
EDIT seems ok, I get 153hz. :devil:
 
Last edited:
Even though the distance over the waves is 2 meters you still set the n to be equal to 3? Are you using the same equation that I used above? The tension is correct that much I do know.
 
Keithkent09 said:
Even though the distance over the waves is 2 meters you still set the n to be equal to 3? Are you using the same equation that I used above? The tension is correct that much I do know.
Yea, I checked it and get 153Hz. N is the wave number right? So that's what I used as it looks like 1.5 lambda stretched across the 2 meters or am I missing something?
 
Yeah I follow that, what did you do with the 1.5 lambda over two meters though. I thought the n=3 was just inserted straight into the equation.
 
Keithkent09 said:
Yeah I follow that, what did you do with the 1.5 lambda over two meters though. I thought the n=3 was just inserted straight into the equation.

Which is what I did, just taking the cue for what harmonic from the pic.
 
The tension should be 41.27397 N. Using that tension, I got 152.36979 Hz as the final answer.

Note that 150 N, 152 N, 153 N, and 155 N are the same if we ignore the least significant digit.

Don't worry about it; you did it right.
 
  • #10
When I plug three in for n i get 57.5.
For me the worked out equation looks like this:
f=(3/2L)*(sqrt(41.3/.001)) with L equaling 5.3. What did you do differently?
When I got 150 earlier I had n equaling a much larger value.
Sorry it is taking me so long to get this.
 
  • #11
Keithkent09 said:
When I plug three in for n i get 57.5.
For me the worked out equation looks like this:
f=(3/2L)*(sqrt(41.3/.001)) with L equaling 5.3. What did you do differently?
When I got 150 earlier I had n equaling a much larger value.
Sorry it is taking me so long to get this.

I took L=2.0m that is the wave is only present in the top segment and stops at the pullies which I took to be points of forced zero amplitude boundary condition.
 
  • #12
Oh, I was using L=5.3 instead of just the distance that really mattered as 2. Thank you very much I got the answer now.
 
Back
Top