Physics teacher wanted me to understand how to derive

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation for centripetal acceleration, a = v^2/r, using foundational physics equations. The user initially struggles with the derivation despite hints to use v = rω and other related equations. Participants suggest that understanding vector differences and employing calculus are crucial for the derivation. They emphasize the importance of visualizing the problem geometrically and manipulating the equations correctly. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexity of the derivation process and the necessity of grasping underlying physics concepts.
jimmy p
Gold Member
Messages
399
Reaction score
72
My Physics teacher wanted me to understand how to derive a=v^2/r using the equations v=d/t, \omega=\theta/t and arc length=r\theta but when it came down to it, i had brain freeze..and when my teacher looked at it, he had brain freeze. This isn't part of my syllabus but i was wondering how you derive the equation (so it isn't homework!)

oh yeah, i was given the hint to work it first into the equation v=r\omega and then work from there.

Cool, i just used that LaTex stuff! that was quite challenging!

thanx

Jimmy P
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
OK unfortuantely i didnt find that too useful. That is kind of what we tried to do but it failed miserably, because we ended up getting T on both sides of the equation. i could get to v=r\omega (if that is even helpful) and couldn't get any further
 
Can you use calculus?
 
Originally posted by jimmy p
OK unfortuantely i didnt find that too useful. That is kind of what we tried to do but it failed miserably, because we ended up getting T on both sides of the equation. i could get to v=r\omega (if that is even helpful) and couldn't get any further
Well, those two threads show how to derive the formula for centripetal acceleration. I know of no other way.

Using the equations you started with, you can certainly get to v=r\omega. But you won't get any further without using the strategy explained in those threads. The "trick" is to find \Delta V---the difference in the velocity vectors---between two points on the circle separated by \Delta\theta.

Why don't you show what you've done and perhaps we can fix it.
 
You have everything EXCEPT a formula for \inline{\Delta v}. This is the real physics; you have to think about it. The rest is just formula manipulation. I remember when I was in high school, I thought about this very thing for days, because I had difficulty coming to terms with how vectors add; I did not understand \inline{a=\Delta v/\Delta t} as a VECTOR equation. But I put in the effort and was rewarded with a career in physics.
 
I haven't looked at either of those links, but I remember first deriving the formula by creating a proportion between the triangle the velocity and acceleration vectors created, and the triangle that the 2 radii and the chord created.
 
cant anyone actually give the answer? i promise that it isn't homework and that i have tried!
 
Try this.
Draw a vector for r with a vector for v on the end (will be 90 degrees from this), then a little time later examine what would happen. The arclength s= r theta is an approximation from geometry.

I haven't done this yet myself, but i am working on it
 
  • #10
for the algebraic way you are looking for you go from v = d/t and find d from the other eqns and get v = r omega
Then with acceleration, a = v / t, substitue the v and you get r omega / t, v=r/t so a = v omega, the trick is a = v^2 omega / v = v^2 omega / ( r omega ) and cancel.

BUT this gives you nothing (not exactly true). Calculus method and geometry - what i siad to do in last post, work the same and give you a good in sight into what happend.
This is related to how Feynman got to grips with QED.
 
  • #11
Although with the geometrical method i can't avoid the final 'trick' bit to go from a = r omega^ 2 to v^2 / r
Doh
 
  • #12
Originally posted by jimmy p
cant anyone actually give the answer?
We have. Several times over. You just don't seem to want to accept it! :smile:
 
  • #13
lol sorry, i wasnt concentrating the other night when i wrote that, thanks guys!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top